The Gospel THEFT Series: Part 2

Updated: Jun 25

Welcome back to those who have been reading through my blog. This is of course a continuation of part 1. If the reader has not read part 1, please do so here as we will be building upon what was said previously. This section will cover Matthew 4 through 7. Part 2 will be a longer study due to the nature of the information presented. This will be stepping on a lot of sacred cows, but ask yourself; what is more important, the doctrine of man, or the truth of the Father?

Matthew Chapter 4

We pick up where we left off, which was at the end of chapter 3. Now in chapter 4, we see that the Messiah has been fasting for 40 days. Someone, who is referred to as the tempter, precedes to test the Son of David. I wish to go over the verses which Messiah quoted. The tempter tells Yesho to turn stones into bread, knowing that he is hungry. Our Messiah is then fed by the Word and is given strength. He quotes of course the Law, Deuteronomy 8:3 He humbled you, and in your hunger, He gave you manna to eat, which neither you nor your fathers had known, so that you might understand that man does not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of Yeue. What an amazing passage. Most have no idea this verse comes from Moses. Yesho was leaning on his loving Father to sustain him in a time of horrible temptation. This is an example for us to follow. When in times of great peril and temptation, we resist, remember the Word of our Father and flee from sin.

The tempter of course does not give up just yet, as temptation typically puts up a fight. The next place Yesho is taken to is the pinnacle of the place of assembly. The tempter asks Yesho to throw himself off and to ask the angels to save him. Yesho’s response is that no one should tempt the Father, for the Father certainly kept his Son safe for the appointed time. I hope it is not lost on the reader what I am referring to. Yesho quotes Deuteronomy 6:16 Ye shall not tempt Yeue your Alahyim, as ye tempted him in Massah. This is of course referring to when the Israelites tempted the Father, Exodus 17:2 when they claimed that Yeue was with them. It’s sort of a challenge to God, to keep his word. And this is evil! For the Father is trustworthy and how dare we ever pin him in a corner for our own glory!

Lastly, the tempter takes Yesho to a high mountain. Keep in mind that in Palestine, the highest point above sea level is approximately 760 feet. I suspect the true location our Messiah was taken was Mt Meru, but regardless of which high peak in the North American continent, it was certainly NOT in Palestine as they have no mountains.

Matthew 4:8-9 Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and shows him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them; And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me.

Now clearly this tempter indeed had the power to offer the world, as Adamites sin, they give up their rightful dominion. When Adam and Eve fell, dominion over the earth fell to another, whether that was a race, or a few individuals, certainly the order of which the Father created was disrupted due to the disobedience of Adamites. Yesho’s response is amazing! Not for a moment, could our Messiah be bought! Matthew 4:10 Then saith Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve. We are to worship only the Father. Not Messiah, not man, not the tempter. Only the Father is to be worshiped! He after all is one, Deuteronomy 6:4! Yesho is quoting Deuteronomy 6:13 Fear Yeue your Alahyim, serve Him only, and take your oaths in His name. I want to show how abundantly clear Matthew is, that the Son points only to the Father here! We serve the Father! Not man! Mark 1:12-13 speak of the temptation of Yesho, completely leaving out the scripture Yesho speaks to the tempter.

Now we continue where Yesho learns that John the Baptist is cast into prison. He then travels back to Galilee [we do not know where this is, it is certainly not taking place in Palestine and that term is six times in the Old Testament, associated with the land, or within the territory of Naphtali], going into a town called Capernaum. I would like to point out that the Old Testament states that both Zebulun and Naphtali have sea coasts as their borders-impossible in the spec of Palestine. The modern town of Capernaum is not on a coast in Palestine. Would anyone call Chicago near a coast? No. Now there is an interesting verse quoted in verses 14 and 15 of Isaiah. Isaiah 9:1-2 "Nevertheless, there will be no more gloom for those in distress. In the past He humbled the land of Zebulun and the land of Naphtali, but in the future, He will honor the Way of the Sea, beyond the Jordan, Galilee of the nations: The people walking in darkness have seen a great light; on those living in the land of the shadow of death, a light has dawned."

This is an incredible passage! And the tragedy is that hardly anyone has the understanding to ascertain its importance. Of course, if we knew the Old Testament books and the significance of 1 Kings chapter 11 and 12, we understand that the kingdom of 12 tribes as one, were split in two. Yeuda and Benjamin in the south, with the remaining 10 in the north. Levi does not count as they did not have a land grant and were in both the north and south to take care of the places of assembly-the two main ones were in Jerusalem and one in Samaria. These were the two capitals. Isaiah, in chapter 9, is prophesying the redemption of the northern sheep of Yshral being given the light of salvation and we know that Messiah only came for the lost sheep of the house of Yshral, Matthew 15:24. No longer will there be darkness for the northern tribes, which Naphtali and Zebulun are indeed a part of, but they will be given the light. How absolutely marvelous. Praise be to the Father! And what does our beloved Messiah do? He begins preaching repentance and the kingdom to his lost sheep, as the good shepherd!

This really pricks my heart, as I know, my people are those lost sheep. The Germanic Nordic Celtic people of the world. And it truly breaks my heart they are so destroyed today, for lack of this knowledge. They do not even know who they are! They actually believe Edom [Jews, both Ashkenazi and Sephardic Canaanite Samaritan non-Adamic mixture] are the chosen people and that the desert of Palestine is the land of milk and honey. Nothing could be further from the truth. Now this passage Yesho quotes from Isaiah 9:1-2, is to be found nowhere else in any of the other gospels. It makes sense however, because none of the other gospels were penned by Yshralites. And as far as the account of Matthew we have access today, it has been seriously altered. And yet it is the one that aligns with the Old Testament the most. The apostle Matthew would be the only one of the four writers, who would truly appreciate Isaiah chapter 9.

So, Messiah is with his sheep, ministering to them and teaching them that they have a way back to the Father, when he chooses his first apostles along the coast. Again, this is not a dead little lake in the middle of the most inhospitable place on earth. Messiah is by an ocean, and the Greek translation calls it Galilee. It was a large and vast place and wrought with storms. There has never been a storm in the modern ‘sea’ of Galilee in recorded human history. And to call that place a sea is an insult to any Adamic's intelligence. That location simply does not fit the descriptions of the true location of this sea. The Great Lakes are over 100 times the size of the pond Galilee, and they are not called seas. Only in Palestine it seems, is a millpond called an ocean, a wadi considered a river, and an ant hill called a mountain. Furthermore the six places where the term Galilee is found in the Old Testament, it suggests a geographical location, not a sea. I digress.

What is never mentioned in the whitewashed NT we are given, is that the apostles, at least the majority of them, were the full-blooded brothers of Yesho. Matthew 4:18 "And Jesus, walking by the sea of Galilee, saw two [brethren], Simon called Peter, and Andrew his brother, casting a net into the sea: for they were fishers. 19 And he saith unto them, Follow me, and I will make you fishers of men. 20 And they straightway left their nets and followed him. 21 And going on from thence, he saw other two brethren, James the son of Zebedee, and John his brother, in a ship with Zebedee their father, mending their nets; and he called them."

According to all of the gospels, the first four Apostles were Simon Peter, Andrew, James, and John. What is not told, or intentionally left out, is that all of these men were Yesho's brothers. We are not told the order of their births either. And it is absolutely possible that Yesho was not the first born. Could he be? Yes, he could. But there is nothing requiring him to be the first born. Both Yosef and David, his ancestors, were also not the first born. Both of them were actually the youngest brother. They were also a foreshadowing of Yesho to come. In short, Yesho is the genetic full-blooded son of Yosef, and full-blooded brothers of at least the first four apostles. He is not Yeue the Father. Mark 1:16-19 does line up with Matthew 4:18-21

Matthew 4:18-21 And Jesus, walking by the sea of Galilee, saw two brethren, Simon called Peter, and Andrew his brother, casting a net into the sea: for they were fishers. And he saith unto them, follow me, and I will make you fishers of men. And they straightway left their nets, and followed him. And going on from thence, he saw other two brethren, James the son of Zebedee, and John his brother, in a ship with Zebedee their father, mending their nets; and he called them. 

All of the deeds and words of Yesho at that time in the land of the northern kingdom, was spreading. He was becoming well-known among the people. Many decided to follow him and learn from his teachings. Many were getting healing from their sickness. I did want to point out one passage in particular, describing a geographical location. Matthew 4:25 And there followed him great multitudes of people from Galilee, and from Decapolis, and from Jerusalem, and from Judaea, and from beyond Jordan. This was a massive multitude of people. No wonder the Pharisees and false prophets living among the people, were concerned. The Messiah for all intents and purposes has a great army of people. They must have seen this as a threat to their power-hold over the people.

Of course, we can only imagine the great population of this area. It is beyond ridiculous to suggest that a place with virtually no water supply, no grazing lands, no farmlands, could support this massive amount of people. We are talking about a huge continent. The northern kingdom alone was massive, with mountains, rivers, plains, lakes, and coasts just as described in scripture. It was larger than the size of New Jersey certainly, which today in terms of size is comparable to Palestine. Our minds have been twisted and warped to suspend logic and reason. But what if we applied them. What geographical picture comes to mind if Palestine did not exist? I will leave that to the dear reader.

The sermon on the Mount was indeed on a tall mountain. Of course, I cannot prove that this mountain was Mt. Horeb; the mountain of Yeue, but it is possible. I suspect it to be the case. There are no such mountains in Palestine. Elijah hides at this mountain if we recall, in 1 Kings 19. Elijah was preaching against the Northern kingdom. How then can the Mountain be southeast and outside the territory of Palestine? Did he cross back over the Yardan to get there? The alleged location of the real Mt Sinai in Arabia is nowhere near the Northern kingdom. There are many problems that reveal themselves when looking at a map of Palestine and comparing that to the scripture.

Matthew Chapter 5

Let's take a look at the sermon. Yesho is teaching the northern house of Yshral how to keep the law. He is giving comfort and love to his sheep that they so desperately needed. It was spoken to Yshral. Not to the Arabs, nor the Asiatic mongoloids, nor the Indians, nor the negroid races. It was for the people of Yoqb [Jacob]. And we are to share that truth and spread it to the world like savory salt. Many love to quote John 3:16, but I ask you, what proof exists that this text was penned by the apostle? And by what authority is it called scripture? I will touch briefly on Luke here and there in this blog but will go into much more detail of Luke chapter 6 in a later study.

Matthew 5:2-12 And he opened his mouth, and taught them, saying, Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted. Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth. Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled. Blessed are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy. Blessed are the pure in heart: for they shall see God. Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God. Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness' sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. Rejoice and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you.

For hundreds of years after the exile of the ten northern tribes, 1 Chronicles 5:26, Yeue’s sheep had no shepherd. They had lost their way. Now, the good shepherd has come to take them home. To care for them, not as a hireling, but as a true shepherd with no conflict of interest. Yesho calls Israel as a whole, the salt of the earth. Matthew 5:13 Ye are the [salt] of the earth: but if the salt has lost his savour, wherewith shall it be salted? it is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men. What does the Scripture tell us about salt? How is salt related to the people of Israel?


2 Chronicles 13:4-5 Then Abijah stood on Mount Zemaraim, which is in the hill country of Ephraim, and said, “Listen to me, Jeroboam and all Israel: Do you not know that the Lord God of Israel gave the rule over Israel forever to David and his sons by a covenant of SALT?
Leviticus 2:13 Every grain offering of yours, moreover, you shall season with salt, so that the salt of the covenant of your God shall not be lacking from your grain offering; with all your offerings you shall offer SALT.
Numbers 18:17-19 But the firstborn of an ox or the firstborn of a sheep or the firstborn of a goat, you shall not redeem; they are holy. You shall sprinkle their blood on the altar and shall offer up their fat in smoke as an offering by fire, for a soothing aroma to the Lord. Their meat shall be yours; it shall be yours like the breast of a wave offering and like the right thigh. All the offerings of the holy gifts, which the sons of Israel offer to the Lord, I have given to you and your sons and your daughters with you, as a perpetual allotment. It is an everlasting covenant of SALT before the Lord to you and your descendants with you.”

In short, salt is both a metaphor and synonym for Yshral. When Yesho referred to salt, the Yshralites listening knew immediately who he was referring to. The Law, the covenant Yshral made with the Father at Mt Horeb. This realization has amazed my family as well as myself. So much of the scripture begins to become abundantly clear. All it takes is for Yshral today [no association whatsoever of Palestine or it’s depraved inhabitants] to study and begin to follow the Law, study the Word, and learn from the Son of David (Yesho). It takes a desire to learn the truth. Sadly, I do not see this in the Christian community nor the Hebrew roots Judaic cult.


Matthew 5:14 Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid. 15 Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house. 16 Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.

The light of the world. Who does Yesho call the light of the world? This may begin to sound like a broken record, but for some, that is what it takes for the truth to sink in. Certainly, no other race of people, not the Arabs, the Indians, the negroids, are this light. Many find their behavior repugnant, as if they are beasts. Not all, but those are the exceptions, not the rule. If this is offensive to some, then I simply ask you; what is more important? Truth? Or feelings. The truth is that no other race but the Adamic peoples, have blessed the world. No other race even attempts to spread the truth of scripture than the Germanic Celtic Nordic peoples. This began and will end with the Aryan peoples. Please do not misunderstand; not all Aryans are created equal either. For the worst Aryans do control the world. These are not the Western European peoples. We will know them by their fruit.

Isaiah chapter 49 is one of the greatest chapters of all the prophets. I encourage the reader to look at it in it’s entirely, but I wanted to highlight one section pertaining to this light Yesho speaks of in Matthew 5:14.

Isaiah 49:6 Yeue said to me, “I have a greater task for you, my servant. Not only will you restore to greatness the people of Yshral who have survived, but I will also make you a LIGHT to the nations—so that all the [erets (land)] may be saved.”

This whole chapter is speaking of the light unto the nations-Yshral. The prophet also speaks of this light in Isaiah 42:6 "I, Yeue, have called you for a righteous purpose, and I will take hold of your hand. I will keep you and appoint you to be a covenant for the people and a light to the nations." A covenant people is a direct reference to the Law by which Yshral promised to keep at Mt. Horeb. Both salt and light are metaphors for the covenant people-Yshral. Is it any wonder then, that none of the other gospels, penned by non-Yshralites record this sermon? It was not for them, and they resented it, or did not understand it. How else can we explain the sermon's absence from these other gospels?

So, after Yesho establishes just who he came for and just who his audience was to be-genetic Yshral, he then establishes the fact that he came to fulfill the Law of the Most High-Yeue.

Matthew 5:17-19 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.

Can it be any more clear, dear Christians? Can we find this passage in any other gospel? Verse 20 seems a bit odd considering that the Pharisees were not righteous at all. I really do not know what to make of it and will let the reader test it for themselves.

Some may say, well what about Luke 16? Luke records some of the Sermon on the Mount, right? Let’s take a look at what this character called Luke writes:

Luke 16:14-17 And the Pharisees also, who were covetous, heard all these things: and they derided him. And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but Yeue knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of Yeue. The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of Yeue is preached, and every man presses into it. And it is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the law to fail.

A bit different? I’d say that it is entirely different. First, Luke records Yesho speaking to the Pharisees, so this is not the Sermon on the Mount. Luke claims that Yesho said the law and prophets were until John the Baptist. Is that true? Matthew says that the law shall not pass away until earth passes away. Luke then claims in verse 17, that it is easier for earth to pass away than for the law to fail. While this may be true, it is not the same as what Yesho says at his sermon to Israel. Failing and doing away with, are not the same concepts and it would be disingenuous to suggest otherwise.

Yesho then teaches on murder. Yes, murder, not kill. For the law allows killing. Murder and kill are two extremely different things. We seem to forget this today. The law says thou shalt not murder in Exodus 20:13. So what is this passage in Matthew 5 really talking about? Premeditation and hatred in the heart for one’s own kinfolk. I apologize for once again stepping on sacred cows, but this passage is not talking about the hatred of another race or people unlike oneself. This is talking about how Yshralites are to treat each other’s genetic tribe in the community and kingdom of Yshral.

Matthew 5:21-22 Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, You shalt not murder; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment: But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council:

Yesho is dealing with a heart issue, for if the heart is healthy and whole, he would never even go so far as to murder.

Matthew 5:27 "Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, thou shalt not commit adultery: 28 But I say unto you, that whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart." This explanation of the law us fairly straightforward. One would never commit adultery if they first had not looked upon a woman first. In the next passage, Yesho is fully upholding the law. Divorce has no place in society whatsoever, unless the woman has committed adultery. And the only time a man can commit adultery, is when he sleeps with a woman who has done so. Adultery is specifically for woman, not men. Sorry ladies, men have a higher status and a different role than we do. If you question this, please read Genesis 3.

Matthew 5:33-37 Again, ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old time, thou shalt not forswear thyself, but shalt perform unto Yeue thine oaths: But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is Yeue's throne: Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King. Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black. But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.

Much evil has come from swearing oaths, Judges11 and 21, to name two examples. At first glance, it seems as if Yesho changing the Law, but look closely. There is no command to swear oaths in the Law. We are not required to swear oaths at all, and in fact Yesho is saying is it is better not do so. Simply let your yes be yes and your no, to be no. Of course, the wording could very well have been changed over time, to put the idea that the law was changed. The next passages does make it sound as if the law was changed.

Matthew 5:38 "Ye have heard that it hath been said, an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: 39 But I say unto you, that ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also. 40 And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloke also. 41 And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain. 42 Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away." This does appear to indicate that we are to simply be doormats. For in Ecclesiastes 3 “To everything there is a season, A time for every purpose under heaven: A time to be born, And a time to die; A time to plant, And a time to pluck what is planted; A time to kill, And a time to heal; A time to break down, And a time to build up; A time to weep, And a time to laugh; A time to mourn, And a time to dance; A time to cast away stones, And a time to gather stones; A time to embrace, And a time to refrain from embracing; A time to gain, And a time to lose; A time to keep, And a time to throw away; A time to tear, And a time to sew; A time to keep silence, And a time to speak; A time to love, And a time to hate; A time of war, And a time of peace.” I do not know what to make of this passage in Matthew 5 as it does contradict all common sense and the law. For we have a right to justice and lawful living. We are indeed to resist evil! James 4:7 Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the tempter, and he will flee from you. I will need to continue to test this passage and openly admit I do not have all the answers. If anyone reading this has a better understanding of the passage in question, I would love any feedback.

In the last portion of Matthew 5, we are told to love our enemies. Perhaps we do not understand the true definition of love. Love does not mean condone. Love does not mean allowing someone to commit sin against. Love does not mean do not tell someone the truth. Love means that we keep the law, despite our enemies wanting anything but for us to keep it. We study and learn the law and walk it out. Be perfect means to resist sin. And it is possible!

Matthew Chapter 6

Matthew 6:1 Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven. 2 Therefore when thou doest thine alms, do not sound a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have glory of men. Verily I say unto you, they have their reward. 3 But when thou doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth: 4 That thine alms may be in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly.

The above passage tells us to not share our giving to the needy, with others or to brag openly. But there is more to it. It also teaches us to not even document it. Many Christians today do not even know they are breaking this command. They write off donations from their taxes don’t they? Would that defy this command from Yesho? Oh yes, yes it would. When you write it off, you are possibly receiving some of it back. You give, and yet it comes back to you later. You have received your reward and your gift was not even recognized by the Father.

Luke is quite different, which will be dissected in more detail in future studies. But I wanted to touch on one verse that differs quite a lot from the account of Matthew. Luke 6:25 "But woe unto you that are rich! for ye have received your consolation." Woe to the rich? Why. For what sin have they committed? Simply because they are rich. Name a single patriarch who was not rich. They were all very wealthy. Certainly, Solomon was the wealthiest man that ever lived. But what was his downfall? The wealth? No. Sin. Marrying women who worshipped false Alayim. There is no law against being wealthy. Whoever penned Luke certainly had an evil Judaic communistic slant. Yes, communism has been around a very long time. Much longer than we are led to believe. For communism stems from the Talmud written by masoretic Jews.

Proverbs15:27 He who is greedy for unjust gain brings trouble on his household, but he who hates bribes will live.

Yeue’s prayer is recorded in Matthew 6:5-15 and Luke 11:1-13. We will compare them here:

Matthew 6:5 "And when thou prays, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the assemblies and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, they have their reward."

Luke utterly skips this part about Yesho exposing the hypocrites. Luke also records that John taught the disciples how to pray but this is not recorded anywhere else. Luke 11:2 "And he said unto them, when ye pray, say, Our Father which art in heaven, hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, as in heaven, so in earth."

Matthew 6:6 But thou, when thou pray, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.

The next two verse in Luke simply says: Luke 11:3 Give us day by day our daily bread. 4 And forgive us our sins; for we also forgive every one that is indebted to us. And lead us not into temptation; but deliver us from evil. This is very different, and the rest of Matthew’s prayer says the following:

Matthew 6:7-15 But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking. Be not ye therefore like unto them: for your Father knoweth what things ye have need of, before ye ask him. After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors. And lead us not into temptation but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen. For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you: But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.

Quite a contrast when looked at side-by-side. Why does Luke exclude so much of the prayer? Luke then spends the next several verses speaking about giving to anyone who asks regardless of how much and with no boundaries or conditions set upon the gifts! This is utter nonsense. Let’s take a look:

Luke 11:5 "And he said unto them, which of you shall have a friend, and shall go unto him at midnight, and say unto him, Friend, lend me three loaves; 6 For a friend of mine in his journey is come to me, and I have nothing to set before him? 7 And he from within shall answer and say, Trouble me not: the door is now shut, and my children are with me in bed; I cannot rise and give thee. 8 I say unto you, though he will not rise and give him, because he is his friend, yet because of his importunity he will rise and give him as many as he needeth. 9 And I say unto you, Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you. 10 For every one that asketh receiveth; and he that seeketh findeth; and to him that knocketh it shall be opened. 11 If a son shall ask bread of any of you that is a father, will he give him a stone? or if he ask a fish, will he for a fish give him a serpent? 12 Or if he shall ask an egg, will he offer him a scorpion? 13 If ye then, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto your children: how much more shall your heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to them that ask him? "

Luke paints a picture that we are to be weak and helpless. We are to be nothing but slaves to the whims of others. Is this really what the Father wants for his people? To be nothing more than slaves? Owning and having nothing? As if owning wealth is selfishness. It almost sounds like what is going on in the world today. With this lockdown nonsense. It has become selfish to want to work and provide for your family. Not giving into corporate demands is now seen as crimes against humanity. Its as if this author, was a Herodian Jew of the New York Times attempting to twist the Messiah’s words and commands. And Christians believe this is scripture? O Father in heaven!

Are bums on the street supposed to beg their whole lives even though they have the ability to work? Are criminals to knock on doors demanding whatever they need until they get what they want, and that individual has no choice but to give them whatever they ask for? What if it is a foreigner from Somalia on drugs and demands 10,000 dollars? Is the homeowner who has been blessed with this depraved individual’s presence, then required to simply hand it over to this negroid? Is that how society is supposed to work? I don’t think so ladies and gentlemen!

The author seems to use this as an analogy that if you continually bother God with prayer, that eventually he will give you what you want. I had to laugh writing this. What absolute cock and bull! There is no mention anywhere in Luke 11 of repentance or doing what the Father asks of us. The door will not be opened to just anyone. Read the story of the ten virgins in Matthew 25, if that is what you believe, dear reader. Luke has some serious problems. It has been casting stumbling blocks at the true Yshralite assembly for far too long. I believe it is time we see this text for what it is, Judaic leaven of the Pharisees.

Yesho next discusses how one should fast. It is quite telling as he describes how the Pharisees fast. They make sure everyone around them knows that they suffer, and that they do it for Yeue, when in reality they do it for recognition of man, as Yesho tells us.

Matthew 6:16 Moreover when ye fast, be not, as the hypocrites, of a sad countenance: for they disfigure their faces, that they may appear unto men to fast. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. 17 But thou, when thou fastest, anoint thine head, and wash thy face; 18 That thou appear not unto men to fast, but unto thy Father which is in secret: and thy Father, which seeth in secret, shall reward thee openly.

If we fast, we do not show it off to others. We do it for the Father. Luke does not mention this command regarding fasting, nor do the other gospels. It is very strange. Fasting may well be how we give offerings of fat to the Father and in prayer commune with Him, if done the correct way. Why did the other gospels not mention this most effective treatment of healing, by fasting and having a deeper connection with the Father? Perhaps this was not their purpose, to truly give correct council to their unwitting readers? I suspect something to that effect.

Matthew 6:19 "Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal: Indeed, for our heart is where our treasure lies." Do the other gospels attest to this? Well, we will look at Luke 12:13-21. It is antinomian and communistic as one can get and it is verses like this that expose their true origins, for communism is about taking everyone’s possession and enslaving humanity:

Luke 12:13-21 And one of the company said unto him, Master, speak to my brother, that he divide the inheritance with me. And he said unto him, Man, who made me a judge or a divider over you? And he said unto them, Take heed, and beware of covetousness: for a man's life consists not in the abundance of the things which he possesses. And he spake a parable unto them, saying, The ground of a certain rich man brought forth plentifully: And he thought within himself, saying, What shall I do, because I have no room where to bestow my fruits? And he said, This will I do: I will pull down my barns, and build greater; and there will I bestow all my fruits and my goods. And I will say to my soul, Soul, thou hast much goods laid up for many years; take thine ease, eat, drink, and be merry. But Yeue said unto him, Thou fool, this night thy soul shall be required of thee: then whose shall those things be, which thou hast provided? So is he that lays up treasure for himself and is not rich toward Yeue.

This passage is also a direct attack upon farmers, for the Pharisees and Canaanites and Edomites loathed them as well. Why? Because they were the descendants of Cain and were cursed from ever farming again, for Cain murdered Abel. Was not Yosef an incredible farmer? Did he not store up food to feed millions of people? Storing up food for oneself and one’s family, is not treasure. It is essential for existing. Clearly the author of Luke is either confused or intentionally trying to deceive its readers. Now, notice what verse 14 says. Luke wishes us to believe that Yesho has not been made a judge over the people of Yshral! That most certainly contradicts Matthew 28:18 "And Yesho came up and spoke to them, saying, “All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth."

And if a farmer has worked year after year and has been blessed with good crops, then yes, he has every right to enjoy the fruits of his labor! Those who have never farmed or are not of families who are or were farmers, may not understand this. I do. I come from a long line of farming families. This has never been described as storying up treasure in the Scripture! Never! And yet Luke spats on the Yshralites by spewing this filth. Farming is one of the most incredible gifts given to Yshral. Edomite Jews have always been jealous of this gift as well. In short, there exists no other passage in the other gospels discussing laying up treasures in heaven. We live not on bread alone, not that we do not store food. That is simply a requirement of being human. I hope this is quite clear to the reader.

Matthew 6:24 No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve Yeue and mammon.

Luke does record this in 16:13, but in front of Pharisees and not Yshralites-for Luke does not record the Sermon on the Mount. Matthew 6:25-34 discuss how we are not to be anxious about our needs, for our Father in heaven knows we are in need of them. We are to trust him to care for us as he is the good shepherd. Note that shepherds are ranchers. It seems that ranching and farming are in Western Europeans' blood. Matthew 6:33 "But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you. 34 Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof." We are to remember our first love, all else comes second. This is once again, a heart issue. Not that we are not to farm or forgo storing food. We need to be a bit more practical in our thinking. The Father never once accuses the rich for being evil simply for being rich!

Matthew Chapter 7

Matthew chapter 7 begins speaking on judging others. Most like to stop at Matthew 7:1 and call it good. But are we to judge others? Most certainly, but we are to use righteous judging, for verse 2 says just that;

Matthew 7:1-2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. If we judge wrongly, then we will be judged as a hypocrite.

Many Christians love to through verse 7:1 out whenever someone comes along and calls out their sinful acts, as if we are not to correct evil and sin as messengers of Yesho. It’s ludicrous. But in case we do not understand Matthew, let’s look at what he was referring to in the law:

Leviticus 19:15 ‘You shall do no injustice in judgment; you shall not be partial to the poor nor defer to the great, but you are to judge your neighbor fairly.
Deuteronomy 1:16 “Then I charged your judges at that time, saying, ‘Hear the cases between your fellow countrymen, and judge righteously between a man and his fellow countryman, or the alien who is with him.
Deuteronomy 16:18 “You shall appoint for yourself judges and officers in all your towns which Yeue your Alayim is giving you, according to your tribes, and they shall judge the people with righteous judgment.

Even John states this in his gospel; John 7:24 Do not judge according to appearance, but judge with righteous judgment.” So, if we know the Law, there is no confusion. It is only if we try and live by the New Testament alone, that things become abstract. Today biblical concepts are allowed to be interpreted apart from their original intent. Why? Why does Yshral today, not appoint righteous judges in the community to rid it of sinful behavior? Because Yshral for one, is occupied by a foreign power. We ae not living under righteous leadership and pastors are nothing but hirelings. What do the other gospels say about judging others?

Luke 6:37 "Judge not, and you will not be judged; condemn not, and you will not be condemned; forgive, and you will be forgiven; 38 give, and it will be given to you. Good measure, pressed down, shaken together, running over, will be put into your lap. For with the measure you use it will be measured back to you." This is once again, different than what we see in Matthew. There is a stark pattern isn't there dear reader? I hope with comparing the gospels; their subtle differences, that Yshral will begin to shed false dogma and begin to be shown the truth.

Matthew 7:3 "And why behold thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considers not the beam that is in thine own eye?" We are called to be perfect. In other words, we are to keep the laws and statutes of the Father. This is what perfection is defines as in the Old Testament. If we go and try to correct a kinsman, we are not to be suffering from that same problem, while trying to correct then. We are to keep our house in order. Only then can we help our fellow kinsfolk. Let us not be as the hypocrites, for hypocrites are identified as the Pharisees.

Matthew 7:6 "Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you. " Now, this verse is quite fascinating to me. For so long, Christianity has been attempting, to no avail I might add, to convert non-Adamic peoples to believe in Yesho and follow biblical teachings. Negroids from Africa. Asiatics in China. Arabs in the Middle East. Even Jews. Has it worked? Has adopting the negroid child over your own kinsfolk made you feel better about yourselves, dear Christian? I will invite my fellow believers to look at the state of affairs of the Aryan South Africans being exterminated by negroids. Why have our efforts as Christians not worked for these people? Or Arabs? Or Indians? Or China? Why are the bases of Christianity only in Western countries? Really think about it. How long will we cast our pearls to dogs?

The Sermon on the Mount builds upon itself. It began with Yesho confirming the Law of Yeue and that it was for Yshral, and Yshral alone. So, in Matthew 7:7, when Yesho tells the people ask and it shall be given to you, he is speaking of those Yshralites keeping the law and serving the Father. He is not speaking to everyone. Luke seems to simply pick and choose what he likes from Matthew-no matter what context is lost in the process! This is the sense I get when reading Luke. Matthew 7:8 For everyone that ask receiveth; and he that seek finds; and to him that knock it shall be opened." Again, this is everyone who is born of Yoqb and following the Father’s Law. How can we be sure? Christians ask for many things and they do not receive the things they ask for. This happens year after year, decade after decade, century after century. Could it be because they are either not following the law, or not genetic Yshral, or both?

Matthew 7:12 "Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets." Now, there is a lot in the scripture about how to live and how to treat others. It is certainly a huge part of the law. But the essence of the Law is to glorify the Father. Many things in the New Testament have been watered down. We have forgotten our first love, and in so doing, the whole point of the Law in the first place. We keep the Law to please the Father, and in so doing we treat our kinsfolk and other non-Adamites, as the Father would have us do. We do not treat witches, murderers, or pedophiles the same as other law-abiding Yshralites, however. We treat people the way the Father commands us to. We judge people depending upon what they do according to the Law, not our whimsical feelings. No, not everyone is created equal. That is another lie we are forced to accept.

Matthew 7:13 Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: 14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.

What is the straight gate? John 10:7 "So Jesus again said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, I am the door of the sheep." If Yesho is the door or gate for the sheep, then the law are the walls of protection. We must learn from Yesho the law and through him we are taught how to keep it. Sadly, much of what was once known about Yesho, and his teachings have been lost. This watered-down version of the New Testament is all we have access to now. Fortunately, we have the Law and the prophets. It is going to take a large amount of study and dedication, but the Father has preserved His word, but not necessarily in English and not necessarily in the way we expect. Many have a desire for the Father. We must endure until the end.

Isaiah 35:8 And there will be a highway called the Way of Holiness. The unclean will not travel it--only those who walk in the Way--and fools will not stray onto it.

The straight and narrow path has always been walking in the ways of the Father-keeping the law. The next passage is a very important warning for Christians today, who for the most part do not heed even in the least.

Matthew 7:15-19 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down and cast into the fire Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.

I have written extensively on the topic of Saul of Tarsus Introduction, Saul of Tarsus Part 1 and Dissecting Romans 3, which I recommend reading. In short, Saul of Tarsus and his followers which branched out in many directions, much like leaven in dough, are the false prophets spoken of here in Matthew 7. Ravenous wolves of course, takes us back to Genesis 49:27 and Saul himself provides us with the link to the puzzle in Philippians 3:5. I find it incredibly interesting that Luke leaves out this section from his scatter-brained volume. I have suspected for a long time that Saul himself had something to do with the creation of the book of Luke, though I cannot prove it. Nor do I wish to. Some of the language however, I simply find eerily similar to the stench of Saul’s own letters. The reader can do what they will with this theory. I certainly am not claiming this to be the case, only that is one conclusion I have considered in my own study.

But let’s look at the fruit, for we can glean quite a bit from this. What is the fruit of rejecting the Law of Yeue in mainstream Christianity? Divorce, atheism, homosexuality, lawlessness, Sunday worship, Pagan idolatry [Christmas, Halloween, and Ishtar days], and hatred towards the books of what we call the Old Testament. The fruits of following Saul not of Yshral, are they not? Eating meat sacrificed to idols-it matters not. Or does it? Revelations 2 anyone? Why did Yesho curse the fig tree in Matthew 21:19? It was good for nothing because it bare no fruit. James 2:18 "Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works."

Matthew 7:21-23 Not everyone that saith unto me, Master, Master, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Master, Master, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.

So, after Yesho explains that you will know someone by their fruit he now tells his people that not everyone who call upon him will enter into the kingdom [gate]. So clearly, we have a problem because John claims that anyone who calls upon him with be saved, the famous John 3:16. Which is true? Those who bear the fruit, or works, of the law of course. Matthew and John are quite different. John will also be discussed at length in a future blog.

We know from verse 21, that not everyone will enter into the kingdom of the Son of David. Why? Because they did not do the will of the Father. What is the will of the Father? Exodus 20 gives a summary. What is the requirement for entering into the kingdom? Keeping the law. I find it incredible that even with warning given to us in the following verse, someone who does not belong to the Messiah or his kingdom, can perform miracles, that Christianity was fooled by Saul just the same. Acts 19? We do not judge someone by their miracle performances or charismatic speeches, but by their fruit. We know Saul was antinomian, and so he bore bad fruit. Now we come to perhaps one of the most important passages to finish out this great sermon on the Mountain, not in Palestine. Those who claimed to do such great miracles and wonders, were never even part of Yesho to begin with! They were never qualified for salvation. Were never going to enter into the kingdom. What did Yesho call them? Workers of iniquity! What is iniquity? Wickedness, sin, lawlessness [without law]. Those who did not keep the law!

Is it no wonder that the people came away from this incredible teaching, amazed? For how many pieces of the puzzle began to be filled in for them? How many verses from the Law and the Prophets started to make sense to these Yshralites who had been divorced? How many cried in agony and repentance? What a site that must have been! I ask the reader to go read all of Luke six and compare it to the sermon on the Mount. See how different they truly are. Like I have said prior, we will dig into that problem in a later teaching.

Matthew 7:24 Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock: 25 And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock. 26 And everyone that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand: 27 And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it.

Now, we can truly understand the wise and foolish man. The house built on a rock instead of the sand. The wise and foolish virgins? Those who have oil in their lamps. Those who keep the Law. For atheists and unbelievers do not wait for their bridegroom, do they? Until next time ladies and gentlemen, wish you many blessings dear kinsfolk of Yshral.