Dissecting Romans 3

Updated: Jun 7



I would first like to give a little introduction for the readers. Romans is no doubt one of the single most popular book for the Torah Hebrew roots crowd as well as for Christians. I find it repugnant that the Torah community hates their own kind, the Christians. From my experience with these people, they attack Christians and believe themselves to be better. I also find it bizarre that many Christians still have no idea the law is for them. By them, I mean Aryan Adamic Germanic Celtic Nordic tribes. Not all so-called White people, for we are not homogenous. The idea that Negroids could ever be Christian, is most ridiculous and that goes for any other non-White aborigal. Christian carries a genetic Aryan connotation, and it is impossible for all races to be Christian. I am a Christian by ethnicity and believe in following the law of the All-Father (Yeue the creator) specifically of the Germanic Celtic Nordic tribes. If Yesho did indeed live, he was a genetic son of David, hence the title. Furthermore, John contradicts Matthew in many ways, but the following example is most unveiling:

"But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Yshral." Matthew 15:24

I also acknowledge that the Law of Yeue is for us today and has NEVER nor will EVER pass away, Matthew 5:17. I believe that we are to keep the commandments based on the entire law and prophets! The Jews [who are mostly Edomite, Samaritan and Canaanite mixture] have rejected the law of the Father-the most obvious example of this would be their incessant parasitically feeding from usruy against my Germanic Aryan people. The Christians reject the Law of the Father and so suffer slavery and cursings as a result. Do not thing that the influx of negroids, arabs, cancer, child slaughter is anything but cursea from Duteronomy 28. Note Jews do not suffer curses, but flourish with ever more sinful behavior. If the Jews were truly the chosen people, they would suffer curses, but they do not. For those who believe and claim all have sinned and that it is impossible to keep the law, then please read Matthew 5:48.


I also wish to make this abundantly clear for those who seem to be in this ever-expanding Jew fog, JEWS CANNOT BE SAVED! They have rejected the law and do not fear or honor the Father, and so just as the Law does not call for rehabilitation, neither should we continue to kid ourselves. ANYONE who aligns themselves with the enemies of Yshral and wars against the Father by breaking and rewriting the laws, will be cut off forever. Prophecy states they will not, for Jews are a vast mixture of the enemies of Yshral, particularly the Samaritan, which is why we see such a Samaritan friendly NT, for they are the authros of it. Obadiah is quite clear as well regarding Edom. They cannot be redeemed. Malachi is most emphatic for the Father's hatred for Edom. If anyone is unfamiliar with this truth, I suggest the reader attempt to show the Jew as the chosen people by using scripture-for you will find they fit not a single prophecy of the Yshralites scattered. Yshral were never to be wanderers. Cain was however, to wander. That should tell us something of the ever wandering Ashkenazi-Gyptie-Jew. True Yshral would be great seafarers, MANY nations and as the sand of the sea, and would bless the world. Jews have not done ANY of these and I am not prepared to call Yeue our creator a liar! The only answer is that, as Ezekiel clearly points to, they are a counterfeit deception. They cast a stumbling block of Baal to the Children of Yshral and bring nothing but curses upon every host nation (only Aryan peoples have nations-for China, India, and Africa are not nations-only proped up aboriginals to decieve Yshralites-or more commonly called; Christians) they parasitically feed from.


I am neither part of the Talmudic led Jewish Hebrew Roots cult, nor am I part of any Christian denomination. I reject the pagan traditions of Christian tradition handed down to us by Saul of Tarsus, the wolf in sheep's clothing and other Jews far older.


This was done. We as Christians have chose someone other than the Father to follow. Saul of Tarsus, the ravenous wolf spoken of in Genesis 49:27 Benjamin shall ravin as a wolf: in the morning he shall devour the prey, and at night he shall divide the spoil." Of which seems to be referred to in Matthew 7:15 "Beware of the false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves."


Yesho associates ravenous wolves with false prophets. Those who would pretend and look like men of Yeue, but they would not be genuine. Did not Saul of Tarsus brag about being of the tribe of Benjamin on several occasions in Romans 11:1 and Philippians 3:5? I recommend the reader look at Judges 20-21, to gain a deeper understanding of just how evil the tribe of Benjamin was replenished after a great battle. Chapter 21 shows how Benjamin was sustained from dying off. Men of Yshral slaughtered many of their own kin who did not take an oath against giving their women to Benjamin. So, the wives of those men who were murdered, were given to what was left of the Benjamite tribe. All of their women were destroyed. It seems quite harsh; however, they defied the law and so they were judged. Over time, these Benjaminite's simply became part of the tribe of Yeuda [Judah].


The tribe of Benjamine was certainly not a distinct tribe by the time of our Messiah Yesho. And with so much mixing in with their brothers, it is quite difficult to pinpoint a Benjamite from that time period. However, the fact that Saul states this is most likely prophetic in nature and was meant to be said so those of us with eyes to see and ears to hear, could be wise and understand who this man truly was. The fact that Saul claims to be of Benjamin, should alert true believers to his true nature. They would inevitably come across Judges chapter 21. Saul unwittingly gave himself away by his boasting. Unfortunately, Christians today are not familiar with two thirds of the book they claim to believe in.


Now let us move onto dissecting Romans 3. We will go line by line testing Saul’s words against the law and prophets to discover if what he claimed is really true. To the Torah Hebrew roots folk, who claim that Saul really taught and followed the law, this claim will be tested. To the Christian, if the Messiah did indeed come to do the will of the Father, John 6:38, you must ask yourself; is it really the Father’s will that you continue to reject the Law? Is it acceptable to the Father that you continue to defy Jeremiah 11:16, clinging so desperately to your antinomianism? These are some very important and significant contradictions in the NT ladies and gentlemen regardless of which side of the fence you adhere to. In short, is Saul the stumbling block of Baal dear Christians.

 
  • Romans 3:1 What advantage then hath the Yeuda? or what profit is there of circumcision?


Here we see Saul asking a question. This requires us to review chapter two for a moment. I will use the KJV for the simple reason that I can see what was added by translators. These parts of the text are found in parenthesis. This may seem harmless, but they bring their bias with them.. It causes much confusion especially when trying to understand Saul. So, I will be omitting the translator's commentary they added to the text. Itt was never there when the texts were first penned and causes much confusion when we desire clarity. Now chapter two mostly speaks of the law and how Saul sees it. But we MUST address that verses 2:13-15 were never in the original manuscripts. In other words, Saul never wrote those verses. In Romans 2:16 Saul calls what he is preaching HIS gospel. Many skip over this detail believing that his gospel was the same as Messiah’s. I have one simple question for you folks, why then, does Saul not simply say Yesho’s gospel? Especially when we consider that there were many false prophets running around with their own gospels and doctrines, Matthew 24:11? No! I am afraid that we cannot assume anything. We must test Saul according to the law. We cannot assume what he refers to as his gospel is the same as our Messiah’s gospel.


It is also quite important to understand who Saul’s audience is. Who is Saul speaking to in Romans chapter 2? Now based on the language, he is speaking to those not of the southern kingdom, our Yahuda, Benjamin, and some Levites. The NT is quite frustrating in that everyone is grouped under one term in English-Jew. Well, I am forced to define this for the sake of understanding the text accurately.


The letter J was not even being used as part of the common language until 1634. We must have an understanding of the history of English, a basic understanding of linguistics, and realize that the NT that we have was written in Koene Greek, or Modern Greek. In other words, the NT texts we have today were written well after the events it describes. What does that tell us if it’s antiquity? At best, the original texts were destroyed, and we only have copies of Catholic approved versions. This is undeniable folks. With that said, I am not saying we cannot glean knowledge from them, only that they are not scripture. I know this may offend the reader. I only ask that you test this out for yourselves.

We must remember that Esau married into the Canaanites and then became known as Edom, which was a Canaanite tribe-fully evil. Amalek was the worst of the Edomites, Genesis 36:12. So modern Jewry is an amalgamation of many races, the two most dominant are Esau, and Canaanite. That is why Jewry is today, hates the Law and hates its Messiah. Many people without this understanding, automatically assume these modern Jews, are the same genetics as the apostles and Messiah. But our bibles have been altered. Jew in the NT does not mean those of the fourth born son of Jacob.

First, during the time of Messiah, there were those who had returned with Nehemiah to the southern kingdom. Some Levites, some Yehudim, and some of Benjamin. Later, we learn Hyrcanus, the Hasmonean, defied Yeue, allowed Edomites to become citizens in the southern kingdom. People at that time had citizenship and so they were, according to our Modern Greek, Ioudaios. That is the term we see various peoples called. Not Jew. Remember the letter J was only in common use in 1634. The term Jew was never denoting ethnicity. It was given this definition in modern times by Jews themselves who had an agenda. For if they were truly being consistent, they would have named the modern state of Israel, Judea. For that is what it is. Using the term Jew in its proper context, is like using the term Roman or American. There is no ethnic connotation to them. But because we have a false idea of just who the Israelites were and their separation in 1 Kings 11, we are easily deceived.


Now, these Edomites began to take over the priesthood due to the sin of Hyrcanus, who was of the line of Aaron. Hyrcanus was a Levite, not a Jew [remember, Jews are Edomite Canaanites]. Herod was the most popular of these Edomites. And he appointed his kin to the highest offices within the priesthood. Ananias was related to Herod, a Herodian Edomite, who was responsible for sentencing Yesho to death, with Pilates' cowardly consent. I would like the reader to consider how much power these Edomites had to scare a Roman governor into submission. I digress.


There is a single passage that gives the Edomites away. This unwitting exposure shows these people were not of any tribe of Israel: They answered him, we are Abraham's seed, and were never in bondage to any man: how sayest thou, Ye shall be made free?” John 8:33. This is utterly overlooked by both Christianity and Hebrew rooters because they do not truly know the front of the book. The Yehudim, or genetic southern kingdom, would never have made such a statement. We know full well that the tribes of Israel, not Edom, were enslaved in bondage. A detailed study of 1 Kings will make quite plain why there are two sticks in Ezekiel 37.


Israel and Yehudim were two different kingdoms. And only the southern kingdom returned with Nehemiah to rebuild. The ten northern tribes were never in Yehudim in the NT, and yet we see some VERY key statements in both Matthew 15:24 and 10:6. A detailed study of the Old Testament will define just who the lost sheep are and were in Yesho’s time. They were never the southern kingdom of two tribes. Levites were among both kingdoms and never had a land grant from Joshua. This is paramount! The reader must understand that many Edomites took over as priests of Levi. However, If these Pharisees conversing with Yesho in the NT, were truly of Levi, and NO OTHER TRIBE HAD THE RIGHT TO BE PRIESTS ACCORDING TO THE LAW, AND if these Jews today are truly of those Pharisees, THEY HAVE NO LEGITIMATE CLAIM ON THE LAND. And they would not have said they were not in bondage in Mizraim.


And if the Pharisees were neither Levite nor Yehudim, and if they are not of the fourth born son of Jacob's lineage, then they had no right to be priests and their claim is null and void per the law Of Moses! Jews today claim to be of those Pharisees and brag they murdered Messiah. In no scenario are the Jews claims on the land [wherever that may be] legitimate. In short, these Pharisees claimed they were never in bondage, because they were never in bondage. They were not Israelites.

Lastly, which hammers the last nail in the coffin for these dead Sepulchers, is the fact that not a single Jew alive today can trace their line back to Yehudim, let alone Abraham! And if you do not believe me, I simply ask for proof that validates the Jews’ claim. It’s as simple as that. I would be happy to take a look at such an elusive family tree. Jews reject the Messiah. So, in any case, they are dead and cut off regardless of bloodline. But even if they do have a genetic connection to Levi, he had no land grant to begin with. Obadiah is the only Book in the Bible solely dedicated to Esau; his modern offspring mixed in with these Jews. For the inevitable Christian who will make the unbiblical statement, ‘well yes but they are still the chosen people even if they reject Messiah.’ I will kindly ask you to prove this using scripture according to Matthew 18.


The term Jew is a word that has no linguistical meaning whatsoever. Many claim it comes from the word Judea, however that word also was not in use until 1634, and so it also has no linguistical meaning. The ten tribes that never returned are Ephraim and they were seafarers, would bless the world, and become many nations. The Jews fit none of these prophecies and so their claim is null and void.


Why is this important in understanding Romans chapter 2? Well, because of who Saul is speaking against. He is not speaking against the Herodian Pharisees, his own people. He is speaking against those of the Southern kingdom keeping the law. Saul is attacking those who are keeping the law. Just as Revelation 12:17 states Satan would attack the elect for holding to the testimony of Yesho and for keeping the commandments. Circumcision is a commandment and that’s that! No if ands or buts about it. But just in case there are those who claim everything is all spiritual now, I recommend reading Ezekiel 44:9.


Back to Romans 3. Saul asks what profit is there in being a Jew? He is asking what profit is there being of the southern kingdom of Yehudim which comprised some of the tribe of Yahuda, Benjamin, and some Levites. They practiced circumcision, INCLUDING the 12 apostles. Because the 12 apostles were not Jewish, as Jews today are not of any tribe of Israel. They were Israelites, some of the southern kingdom, some of the northern kingdom, but Israelites, nonetheless. These terms, Jew and Israel, are NOT mutually exclusive. Saul is asking, what is the benefit of being one of the children of Yehudim or southern kingdom, or simply any one of the 12 tribes. And what is the benefit of being circumcised? Well Saul, let's quote Moses shall we: Deuteronomy 32:8 When the Most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel.


When the Most High divided to the nations into their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel. What is the benefit of circumcision? Deuteronomy 7:12 Wherefore it shall come to pass, if ye hearken to these judgments, and keep, and do them, that the LORD thy God shall keep unto thee the covenant and the mercy which he swore unto thy fathers: 13 And he will love thee, and bless thee, and multiply thee: he will also bless the fruit of thy womb, and the fruit of thy land, thy corn, and thy wine, and thine oil, the increase of thy kine, and the flocks of thy sheep, in the land which he sware unto thy fathers to give thee. Let us see if Saul quotes the Word of Yeue in the next verse?


  • Romans 3:2 Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of Yeue.


Now Saul does acknowledge that it is indeed a benefit to be of the allotment of Yeue, and the reason he gives, seems sufficient. What is Saul referring to here regarding the oracles of Yeue? All 12 tribes were entrusted with the Word of God, but so was Adam. Adam was not an Israelite. But he fell and so Abraham and then Jacob is given the commandments of Yeue. And the Israelites were commanded to keep the law at Mt Sinai. Is this what Saul is referring to? Most likely. It states in Deuteronomy 4:8 And what nation is great enough to have righteous statutes and ordinances like this entire law I set before you today? I will state that the law is for all Adamites per Exodus 12:49.

  • Romans 3:3 For what if some did not believe? shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect?


Now this verse is a bit confusing. Is Saul saying that if there are some that disbelieve, Yeue will keep his covenant anyway with them that did not believe? Or that His will be done regardless of those that disbelieve? Let us give Saul the benefit of the doubt and go with the latter for now.


  • Romans 3:4 God forbid: yea, let Yeue be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, that thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.


Saul now begins using scripture to validate his point. Christians fail to cross reference the quotes Saul uses from the Old Testament, and therefore miss the subtle lies. Saul is quoting David in Psalms 51. This Psalm is about receiving a clean heart from Yeue. David is acknowledging his sin and repenting of it, asking the Father to cleanse him of his sin. First of all, this Psalms has NOTHING to do with circumcision! It is David asking for forgiveness after he committed adultery with Bathsheba. So, the first thing to acknowledge, is that Saul is using David’s words out of context. Psalms 51:4 states Against thee, thee only, have I sinned, and done this evil in thy sight: that thou mightest be justified when thou speakest, and be clear when thou judgest.


David repents and admits his sin before the Father. And knows that Yeue will be just in the judgement, or punishment given to David for his adultery. Saul, in Romans 3:4 alleges every man is a liar. This is not true of course! Not every man is a liar. Saul begins chapter 3 speaking of those that do not believe, then claims every man is a liar quoting David who is repenting of adultery? This is laughable! What exactly is Saul even trying to say here? I am sure many Christians' love to commit eisegesis upon the text, but I ask the reader to forgive me if I do no such thing. I am trying to understand just what Saul claimed apart from subjective assumptions. Let’s continue.


  • Romans 3:5 But if our unrighteousness commend the righteousness of God, what shall we say? Is God unrighteous who taketh vengeance?


Now this is very interesting. Saul switches tenses here. In verse 3, he says what if some did not believe? Now here in verse 5, he is referring to himself and others’ unrighteousness, by using the word ‘our!’ Incredible! Why have others not taken the time to do this before? It baffles me. It seems that Saul is admitting, possibly indirectly, that he is being unrighteous. Could this be true? Of course, I will let the reader study this further. I am simply pointing out these rather odd inconsistencies.


  • Romans 3:6 God forbid: for then how shall God judge the world?


Indeed! For if there be no law, there is no forfeiture.


  • Romans 3:7 For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner?


My first question would be how can we prove the truth abounded from a lie? Lies hide the truth. Yeue shares his truth in spite of lies and sin, but not because of them. Saul’s assertion is utter nonsense. It is interesting is it not, that Saul goes from ‘some who did not believe’ [I surmise either in the law or in Messiah, which is by default not believing the law] in verse 3, to ‘our unrighteousness’ in verse 5, to now ‘my lie’ in verse 7! Just what is Saul’s lie? Let us at least look at what happens to liars from an authoritative text shall we! Revelation 21:8 But for the cowardly and unbelieving and abominable and murderers and immoral persons and sorcerers and idolaters and all liars, their part will be in the lake that burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death.


Israel and Yehudim were two different kingdoms. And only the southern kingdom returned with Nehemiah to rebuild. The ten northern tribes were never in Yehudim in the NT, and yet we see some VERY key statements in both Matthew 15:24 and 10:6. A detailed study of the Old Testament will define just who the lost sheep are and were in Yesho’s time. They were never the southern kingdom of two tribes. Levites were among both kingdoms and never had a land grant from Joshua. This is paramount! The reader must understand that many Edomites took over as priests of Levi. However, if these Pharisees conversing with Yesho in the NT, were truly of Levi, and NO OTHER TRIBE HAD THE RIGHT TO BE PRIESTS ACCORDING TO THE LAW, AND if these Jews today are truly of those Pharisees, THEY HAVE NO LEGITIMATE CLAIM ON THE LAND. And they would not have said they were not in bondage in Mizraim.


  • Romans 3:8 And not rather, Let us do evil, that good may come? whose damnation is just.

I want to reemphasize that any text in parenthesis was not penned by the author, and so I reject it on the grounds that it was added much later. The text reads the way it should above. Study it carefully. Saul is calling for his listeners to do evil, claiming that God uses everything for good. That is what Saul is saying here and the reader cannot get around it. If you wish to be a defender of a lawless man your whole entire life, be my guest, but you are by default breaking the law and will be judged for condoning a sinner yourself. Do you really want to take part in the sin of another, when you have plenty to atone for yourself? I’d consider that very carefully if it were me.


Of course, I could find no other references of any prophet making this claim. On the contrary, they testify the exact opposite. Psalm 34:14 Depart from evil and do good; Seek peace and pursue it. We are to run as far away from doing evil as possible! James 4:7 “Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.” Our Messiah states this quite plainly in Matthew 6:13 “And lead us not into temptation but deliver us from evil.” I ask the reader to provide a verse where a prophet of Yeue commands us to do evil! A single one! Saul is correct, that if one does evil, his damnation is truly just. Let’s continue.


  • Romans 3:9 What then? Are we better than they? No, in no wise: for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin;

First of all, we do not know how Saul has proven that every single individual who is of the 12 tribes of Israel, or all of the Adamites who were not Israelites were guilty of sin. Is Saul a judge? He has provided no credentials whatsoever to be considered a judge of Israel. It is true that all have sinned, however, there are righteous men in the world and those who are not under sin. There is a difference. Saul claims that all are under sin. Does this include the 12 lambs whose names will be written on the foundations of New Jerusalem, Rev 21:14? Does this include James the Just?


Now one point needs to be made abundantly clear. That of the meaning of the term gentile. This word is absolutely misunderstood. The fact that Saul differentiates here, [Jew] and gentile, shows his Talmudic mindset. For it is the Canaanite Edomite, or modern Jews who created the false meaning of that term gentile. Let us look at the first use of that term which has been transliterated into Gentile. The Old Testament translates the Masoretic word goy, or gentile, into nations.


Genesis 12:2 is the first time that word, Strong’s H1471, is used; And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing:

Now, that word nation, is what the Jews today call goyim or gentile. But the text is clear! Abraham was a nation of gentiles. Abraham was a gentile. Jacob was a gentile. The 12 tribes were gentiles. Even Esau were gentiles. The fact that Saul is differentiating Jew and gentile here, and the fact that this is a consistent theme through the NT, shows its lack of antiquity, or at the very least, that it has been whitewashed. We have a strong case of the NT being an overwrite of the original. It shows that the Jews altered the NT, and that Saul was one of their progenitors. Saul doesn’t know the Old Testament that well or he would know that Jews, as he calls them, are gentiles! Scripture does not call the Israelites non-gentiles.


Israel gentiles are the Father’s inheritance and they are set apart from the other Adamic nations or gentiles. The word nation in every instance in scripture would be goyim, or gentile. Israel is special and not everyone is or can be Israel. Just go read Ezra 4:3. There is a specific purpose for Israel! Only the Levites could be priests. Only Yahuda could hold the kingship. Only Dan was the Judge among Israel. There are certain duties and yes-the scripture differentiates people and they are not all equal. The bible does not teach equality. The NT narrative, pioneered by this false prophet Saul, wants the reader to believe that everyone is equal and that we are all the same. This is a lie! There were only 12 apostles and Saul was not one of them. Revelation 21:14 And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and in them the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb. And they will have a very special and specific purpose; Matthew 19:28 And Yesho said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. Can the reader honestly say now that there are 13 apostles? Messiah handpicked 12 and I am going to submit to his word alone! What will you do dear reader?


Lastly, let us address the allegation that all are under sin. If Messiah came to set Israel free from sin, so that we are no longer slaves to it, paying the ransom, and knowing he taught us to keep righteous law which brings us blessings, then how can all be under sin? The fact is, that claim made by Saul in Romans 3:9, is not true. Saul is attempting to justify his sin, by lying. And we call this book scripture? I ask the reader plainly, though we all have sinned, are we all under sin. In other words, are we all under the power of sin? Knowingly practicing sin and being cursed by it? Were the 12 apostles practicing sin? Considering that the names of the 12 are written on the foundations of New Jerusalem, and that they will be sitting on thrones, righteously judging the 12 tribes, I am going to conclude that they were not under sin. Being righteous does not mean we have never sinned; it means we choose to keep the law and flee from sin and not partake in it! Do we make mistakes? Yes, we do. But we repent and turn back to Yeue and ask for guidance and wisdom. Saul would know this, if he truly knew the Old Testament. Perhaps he did, and intentionally rejected it, which is why he would be judged as a sinner by the Most High.


  • Romans 3:10 As it is written: “There is none righteous, no, not one;

It will be shown that Saul is desperately grasping at straws here and taking another quote from scripture completely out of context. Saul is attempting to validate his claim by quoting Psalms 14. This section is about the fool who denies there is a God. It reads; Psalms 14:1-3 To the chief Musician, A Psalm of David. The fool hath said in his heart, there is no Aleym. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good. Yeue looked down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there were any that did understand, and seek God. They are all gone aside, they are all together become filthy: there is none that doeth good, no, not one.


David is saying that for those who deny the fact that there is a God who created all things, that there is not one good one among them [them that deny God]. Not all men living! Saul also attempts to quote Psalms 53, which is about the fool who claims that there is no God. It reads; To the chief Musician upon Mahalath, Maschil, A Psalm of David. The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God. Corrupt are they, and have done abominable iniquity: there is none that doeth good. God looked down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there were any that did understand, that did seek God. Every one of them is gone back: they are altogether become filthy; there is none that doeth good, no, not one. Have the workers of iniquity no knowledge? who eat up my people as they eat bread: they have not called upon God.


We have a problem. Either Saul is ignorant of the scripture [in which case, why is he even teaching anyone?], or he is intentionally taking verses out of context to support his false gospel, which evidently contains doing evil and validating it! It’s not looking good for our self-appointed apostle.


  • Romans 3:11 There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God.

These are some serious allegations! And one which directly defies the words of our Messiah. Mark 4:11 And he said unto them, unto you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God: but unto them that are without, all these things are done in parables: Yes! Messiah just said that his words were not for everyone. And the disciples did not ask what the parables meant, they asked why he was speaking to them in parables, in verse 10. But he also affirms that these 12 DO understand and that they were seeking after the things of the kingdom, the things of the Father. Was this allegation written by Saul a slight against the true assembly? Because clearly, he was not among them at any time learning from them the parables of Yesho nor of the true assembly of the 12 apostles, Galatians 1:12, 2:6.


The assembly was slaughtered brutally for the true gospel! Is Saul claiming they all died in vain? Having no understanding and that none of them were seeking the Father? It is ludicrous to suggest such a ridiculous notion. And yet Saul is claiming exactly that! Let us read what john wrote, 1 john 2:19 They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us. Let us also read what Yahuda [or Jude the brother of Yesho our Messiah] wrote; Jude 1:4 For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our Aleym into lasciviousness, and denying the only Yeue Alayim, and our Messiah Yesho. Why is Saul claiming that no one had understanding or that no one was seeking Yeue? Considering how critical he wrote of the assembly Messiah started, in Galatians, it seems that Saul is trying to cast a stumbling block at people to doubt the anointed 12 apostles.


  • Romans 3:12 They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that doeth good, no, not one.


Saul is repeating his assertion that they have turned away from, according to the context of this chapter, Saul’s gospel. Who are they? The seven churches that rejected Saul? 2 Timothy 1:15. Or are the 'they' the 12 apostles with the true assembly? Who else could they be?


  • Romans 3:13 Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips:


Again, who is the 'their,' Saul is talking about? This can be a matter of perspective, and this can really only be fully understood by knowing just who Saul is referring to here. Unfortunately, we cannot know for sure. However, based on what we have gone over thus far, does this Saul character seem to be a trustworthy man?


Let us look at the verses Saul is quoting. Psalms 5:9 For there is no faithfulness in their mouth; their inward part is very wickedness; their throat is an open sepulchre; they flatter with their tongue. This is a description of wicked men. Messiah used the metaphor of a whitewashed sepulchre to describe the Edomite Pharisees, did he not? Matthew 23:27 Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like tombs having been whitewashed, which indeed outwardly appear beautiful, but inside they are full of bones of the dead, and of all impurity. Now let us consider some things; Messiah is calling Pharisee's hypocrites, and that on the outside they seem to be upright men but are dead inside. Was Saul a Pharisee? Philippians 3:5 and Acts 23:6. Yes he was. Let us also acknowledge Saul being caught in his own lie in Act 23, for he was not placed before the council because of a disagreement over the resurrection, but because Saul was speaking against the law and polluting the temple, Acts 21:28.


Saul is a Pharisee and proud of it, using it to gain credibility in front of the council. Were any of the 12 apostles, Pharisees? What does Messiah call Pharisees? Hypocrites! That they have an appearance of beauty, but full of impurity! Messiah gives us two specific warnings against Pharisees; Mark 8:15, Matthew 16:6. Now the other warning is coupled with a command to keep the law. During the time of Messiah, each Sabbath day, a section of the Law would be read in front of the people. A weekly bible reading if you will. Now read what Messiah says about this; Matthew 23:2-3 Saying, the scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat: All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.


This is perhaps one of the most important verses to understand, concerning what and who we are to follow! Read the passage one more time ladies and gentlemen. The Pharisees are reading the law and telling the people to keep that law. The Messiah tells them to do what is in the law! He also says something of extreme importance regarding the Pharisees' trustworthiness. The Pharisees pretend to be righteous, but they do not practice what they preach! They may say something that is true, but are they actually following it themselves? The Messiah tells us they do not. This is why Christians are so deceived and then begin to worship Saul’s letters. Because the Christain believes that he is a trustworthy individual, when in fact our Savior warns us against the leaven of the Pharisees. Christians do not heed his warning.

Yesho commands us to do all that is in the Law of Moses. We are simply not to follow the example of the Pharisees because they do not actually follow it. Understand dear Chrisitan what the Messiah is telling us here! There is not a single case in the gospels where the Pharisees are shown doing the right thing! They always do the wrong and evil thing! This is a consistent theme all throughout the gospels! Messiah warns us over and over about these people called Pharisees. Messiah exposes them as not part of the chosen people of Yoqb. Messiah exposes them as traitors and usurpers. So why then, do we trust one? To the Hebrew rooters, if he is just teaching the law, well isn't that what Messiahs tells us that is the very thing they do not do? The fruit of the Pharisees were rotten because they did not follow what they were teaching! So, I will be quite blunt to my fellow Hebrew rooters; who cares if Saul taught the Law? He did not practice the law even if he was teaching it! Circumcised or not.


To the Christian, why are you choosing Saul over Messiah? For he prophesied that you would do this; John 5:43 I am come in my Father's name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive. He is using a singular pronoun in this sentence. He is speaking of a single individual. We have absolutely NO pretense or example of listening to a Pharisee! We do what the Law says per Matthew 23.


Saul also quotes Psalms 140:3 in Romans 3:13. Let’s read it in context and see who whose lips are really full of poison; Psalms 140:2 They have sharpened their tongues like a serpent; adders' poison is under their lips. Selah. So they in Psalms 140, are EVIL MEN! What is Saul doing quoting all of these verses for? He is trying to justify that no matter who we are, we do evil and that it is ok since God’s righteousness is shown despite evil. And that even though he lied, verse 7, it's ok because we all have sinned. Saul claims there is no one righteous cherry picking from Psalms to justify this notion. The problem is that ONLY WICKED AND EVIL MEN are sinners. Righteous men do not fall under sin! Noah, Job, Enoch, Abraham and Daniel are some examples of men who were not under sin! They were righteous; not evil or wicked men!


  • Romans 3:14 Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness:


Again, the Psalmist is speaking of evil men. Not all men! Consider David’s friend Nathan. Was David lumping everyone, including Nathan here in Psalms? God forbid! Psalms chapter 10 is about wicked men. Saul is jumping all over the book of Psalms cherry picking verses that sound good which he can pull out to create his own dogma! But it’s not sincere or trustworthy to do so! Read the entire chapter of Psalms 10 and show me where it speaks of ALL men! And yes, Saul is trying to say that ALL men are under sin here, Romans 3:9.


  • Romans 3:15 Their feet are swift to shed blood:


Saul moves away from Psalms at this point, and he now is quoting a passage from Proverbs 1:16. Let’s take a look; Proverbs 1:1-7 The proverbs of Solomon the son of David, king of Israel; 2 To know wisdom and instruction; to perceive the words of understanding; 3 To receive the instruction of wisdom, justice, and judgment, and equity; 4 To give subtilty to the simple, to the young man knowledge and discretion. 5 A wise man will hear, and will increase learning; and a man of understanding shall attain unto wise counsels: 6 To understand a proverb, and the interpretation; the words of the wise, and their dark sayings. 7 The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and INSTRUCTION.


So, we have here a passage written from the most wise man that ever lived, Solomon. We see that he is speaking about a wise man who fears Yeue. The beginning of wisdom is the fear of Yeue. What an incredible passage! Oh, but we see a problem right off the bat with Saul’s statement don’t we! Solomon says that fools despise wisdom and instruction! Did Saul seek the wisdom of the men who were hand chosen by Messiah? Did he seek the council of the wise and Just brother of Yesho, James?

Let’s let Saul answer; Galatians 1:11-12 But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it…..17 Neither went I up to Jerusalem to them which were apostles before me; but I went into Arabia, and returned again unto Damascus. So, Saul rejected the teaching of the set apart ones, the apostles. Did the Messiah command the apostles to go and teach? Matthew 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:


The role of the apostles was to teach the true gospel to others, because they understood what that was. They were personally under the Messiah’s leadership! Anyone who did not want to learn from those 12 men; those who truly knew what Messiah taught, those who understood all his sayings and parables, must surely have been a fool indeed! Proverbs 1:7 applies to Saul! How ironic.

Now, let’s look at the context of the verse Saul quotes, since we have established the context of the beginning of Proverbs 1. Proverbs 1:8-16 My son, hear the instruction of thy father, and forsake not the law of thy mother: 9 For they shall be an ornament of grace unto thy head, and chains about thy neck. 10 My son, if sinners entice thee, consent thou not. 11 If they say, Come with us, let us lay wait for blood, let us lurk privily for the innocent without cause: 12 Let us swallow them up alive as the grave; and whole, as those that go down into the pit: 13 We shall find all precious substance, we shall fill our houses with spoil: 14 Cast in thy lot among us; let us all have one purse: 15 My son, walk not thou in the way with them; refrain thy foot from their path: 16 For their feet run to evil, and make haste to shed blood.


Who is it that makes haste to shed blood and run to do evil? Sinners! We have Josephus recording in [allegedly] 62 AD, that Saul is doing just that! Shedding innocent blood and running to do evil;

Josephus 20:9:4 "Costobarus also, and SAULUS, did themselves get together a multitude of wicked wretches, and this because they were of the royal family; and so they obtained favor among them, because of their kindred to Agrippa; but still they used violence with the people, and were very ready to plunder those that were weaker than themselves. And from that time it principally came to pass that our city was greatly disordered, and that all things grew worse and worse among us. "

So, even if Acts 8 is allegedly in the early 40’s, he is still murdering and pillaging the Assembly after the death of James the Just, which was in 62 AD. Please see my blog 'Who Murdered James?' Saul himself is the very many that Solomon describes as being a sinner in Proverbs chapter 1. This is in part why both Christians and Hebrew rooters both reject the account of Josephus; it exposed their false god Saul of Tarsus.

  • Romans 3:16-17 Destruction and misery are in their ways: 17 And the way of peace have they not known:

Saul has now jumped to Isaiah 59:7. It would be prudent to start at the beginning of the chapter to gain some context on just who Isaiah is talking about; Isaiah 59:1-2 Behold, the LORD'S hand is not shortened, that it cannot save; neither his ear heavy, that it cannot hear: 2 But your iniquities have separated between you and your God, and your sins have hid his face from you, that he will not hear. So, iniquity is what has separated these people from Yeue. Their evil and sin has done this! Not Satan. NOT other people! By THEIR OWN ACTIONS, as sinners! Isaiah 59:3 For your hands are defiled with blood, and your fingers with iniquity; your lips have spoken lies, your tongue hath muttered perverseness. Whose hands are defined with blood? THE SINNERS! Isaiah 59:6 Their webs shall not become garments, neither shall they cover themselves with their works: their works are works of iniquity, and the act of violence is in their hands. They are workers of iniquity! Now to the verse Saul cherry picks; Isa 59:7 Their feet run to evil, and they make haste to shed innocent blood: their thoughts are thoughts of iniquity; wasting and destruction are in their paths. Who are they? THOSE WHO COMMIT INIQUITY! Is Isaiah speaking of ALL men? NO! Only those who do evil! Like Saul for example.


  • Roman 3:18 There is no fear of God before their eyes.

Saul now quotes ONLY part of Psalms 36:1. Here is the full verse; Psalms 36:1 To the chief Musician, A Psalm of David the servant of the LORD. The transgression of the WICKED saith within my heart, that there is no fear of God before his eyes. Do we see a pattern forming? Saul is completely ignoring the fact that each and every verse he is choosing from the prophets, are those describing WICKED MEN! NOT ALL MEN!


  • Romans 3:19 Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God.

This is a blasphemous statement to say the very least. Let’s find out just why! I am not sure that Saul is quoting a verse here, because I cannot find any scripture which states that the Law stops the mouth from speaking. Saul claims that the law stops men from speaking, AND ALL the world became guilty before Yeue. Let’s see what the Scripture says, as it is our litmus test to discover false prophets and wolves in sheep's clothing! Psalms states the following: Psalms 63:11 But the king will rejoice in God; all who swear by Him will exult, for the mouths of liars will be shut. We clearly see that the liars will be stopped, and their mouths’ shut. Does Saul differentiate the righteous from the liars? No, no he doesn’t. Interesting. It’s almost as if Saul is not distinguishing the clean from the unclean, or right from wrong. He is lumping everyone in together and applying scripture describing wicked me, and claiming they are speaking about ALL men. Psalms 107:42 The upright see and rejoice, and all iniquity shuts its mouth.


We are all certainly accountable to Yeue. We are all under the judgement of Yeue. When looking at different translations, they differ somewhat. Essentially what Saul claims is that we are only accountable to Yeue if we are under the law. I want to make a point here and say that coming under the judgement of Yeue is not a bad thing. Yeue judges what is good and what is evil. Simply making a judgement on something does not mean guilt necessarily! Like when Moses made a judgement for neighbors who have a dispute and are seeking council to determine what the best course of action is. The world being accountable to Yeue, does not mean all are sinful, though often times it does.


  • Romans 3:20 Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.

Saul is teaching that Yesho’s purpose was to free us from the law. Saul hates the law. Is it any wonder why Christians also hate it? Saul has become their god. Well James calls the Law freedom and those who do it shall be blessed! James 1:25 But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed. The word translated liberty, literally means freedom from slavery. Wisdom comes from the Law; Psalms 19:7 The law of the LORD is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the LORD is sure, making wise the simple. Yeue HIMSELF commands us to follow them; Deuteronomy 4:6 Observe them carefully, for this will show your wisdom and understanding in the sight of the peoples, who will hear of all these statutes and say, "Surely this great nation is a wise and understanding people.


Whose will did Yesho come to fulfill? John 6:38 For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me. Who sent Yesho? John 7:28-29 Then cried Jesus in the temple as he taught, saying, Ye both know me, and ye know whence I am: and I am not come of myself, but he that sent me is true, whom ye know not. But I know him: for I am from him, and he hath sent me. Take note that Yesho was speaking to Pharisees who studied the Word every day. And Yesho says that the Father does not know them. They were not following what they preached. Does Yeue the Father change? Malachi 3:6 For I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.


Was Abraham justified by faith alone? Is there even a valid example in scripture of someone having faith without works? Or was he justified BECAUSE HE WAS A DOER OF THE LAW? Genesis 26:5 Because that Abraham OBEYED my voice, and KEPT my charge, MY commandments, MY statutes, and MY laws. What are the many blessings of Yeue a result of? Genesis 22:18 And through your offspring all nations of the earth will be blessed, because you have obeyed My voice. Blessings are a direct result of KEEPING the Law! Abraham was justified because he kept the law. Let’s define the word righteous; it is Strong’s H6662, which means just and LAWFUL. Everyone in the Scripture described as being righteous, kept the Law of Yeue. Think about that. Everyone described as wicked or evil, broke the Law.


I ask the reader to find a single person in Scripture, the Law and the Prophets, who was saved from just a belief or thought? No deeds required? Can the reader provide a single example? If the law was nailed to the cross [there exists no single verse that says this by the way] then how does Yeue judge the wicked and the sinner in Revelation? How is Satan evil, if that which defines evil is gone? How is murder still wrong? The Law is more than eating correctly and resting on the Sabbath. It is how we are to live, how we are to treat people, and how to prevent sin from festering in a society. It is perfect governing.


Righteousness is doing what is right and living rightly according to the Father’s definition and statutes. Murder is wrong, because Yeue says it is. The Law of Moses protects families from robbers. It protects women and makes sure they are cared for. The Law protects people from being accused falsely. The law teaches us how we are to treat our spouse and how to properly raise our children. The law teaches us how to make sure no one goes hungry and sees that everyone’s needs are met. It is a life of overabundance and peace.


If there were no robbery, usury, adultery, murder, how can Christians today claim that would be a burden or evil? We are indeed justified under the protection of the law. Which makes Saul’s claim blasphemous and lawless. The word translated justified that Saul uses, means to render just or be righteous. Isaiah 2:3 And many peoples will come and say, “Come, let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, To the house of the God of Jacob; That He may teach us concerning His ways And that we may walk in His paths.” FOR THE LAW WILL GO FORTH FROM ZION. And the word of the Lord from Jerusalem. What are the deeds of the law? Let us show what these truly are, to see if one is indeed justified by them-by doing them:

  1. Exo 20:1 And God spake all these words, saying, 2 I am the LORD thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. 3 Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

  2. Exo 20:4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: 5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; 6 And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.

  3. Exo 20:7 Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.

  4. Exo 20:8 Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. 9 Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: 10 But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: 11 For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.

  5. Exo 20:12 Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.

The first five show us what we are to do; worship the One True Alahyim, have no idols, not take his name in vain, keep the Sabbath, and honor our parents.

  1. Exo 20:13 Thou shalt not MURDER. Today people confuse murder with kill. They are as different as night and day. We are commanded to murder. But we have the right under the law to kill animals and execute sinners. Make no mistake!

  2. Exo 20:14 Thou shalt not commit adultery. This includes fornication and homosexuality.

  3. Exo 20:15 Thou shalt not steal.

  4. Exo 20:16 Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.

  5. Exo 20:17 Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.

The remaining five show us what we are NOT to do. Now these are a summarization of the full law. To understand just how to carry these ten out in our daily lives and live by them, we study the Law. This was the role of the Levites; to teach us the ways of the Law. Of course, they failed. The Law was not to blame. Yeue did not break his promise. It was Jacob’s sons who failed. And they were divorced because they broke the Law time and time again. Yesho our Savior came to mend that covenant between Israel and the Father. For he even said so; Matthew 15:24 I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.


These ten laws are the foundation of righteous living and goodness! These DEFINE what good and evil are. They are not arbitrary as so many Christians believe today. They are literally set in stone and concrete. They are absolute! So, if these are the deeds of the law, then are we justified in DOING and KEEPING them? The answer is in the very definitions of law, righteous, justified, and holy. For in the last days, after the return of our King, the nations will go to be taught of the ways of Yeue; Micah 4:2 Many nations will come and say, “Come and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord And to the house of the God of Jacob, That He may teach us about His ways And that we may walk in His paths.” For from Zion will go forth the Law, Even the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.


Now the following passage is a real-life example of the deeds of the law justifying a man. A man by the same name as our Savior. Yesho the high priest in Zechariah chapter 3. This is a perfect example of what the Savior has done for all of Israel. So that we can come back to the Father. Come back into covenant with him:

Zec 3:1 And he shewed me Joshua the high priest standing before the angel of the LORD, and Satan standing at his right hand to resist him. 2 And the LORD said unto Satan, The LORD rebuke thee, O Satan; even the LORD that hath chosen Jerusalem rebuke thee: is not this a brand plucked out of the fire? 3 Now Joshua was clothed with filthy garments, and stood before the angel. 4 And he answered and spake unto those that stood before him, saying, Take away the filthy garments from him. And unto him he said, Behold, I have caused thine iniquity to pass from thee, and I will clothe thee with change of raiment. 5 And I said, Let them set a fair mitre upon his head. So they set a fair mitre upon his head, and clothed him with garments. And the angel of the LORD stood by. 6 And the angel of the LORD protested unto Joshua, saying, 7 Thus saith the LORD of hosts; If thou wilt walk in my ways, and if thou wilt keep my charge, then thou shalt also judge my house, and shalt also keep my courts, and I will give thee places to walk among these that stand by. 8 Hear now, O Joshua the high priest, thou, and thy fellows that sit before thee: for they are men wondered at: for, behold, I will bring forth my servant the BRANCH. 9 For behold the stone that I have laid before Joshua; upon one stone shall be seven eyes: behold, I will engrave the graving thereof, saith the LORD of hosts, and I will remove the iniquity of that land in one day. 10 In that day, saith the LORD of hosts, shall ye call every man his neighbour under the vine and under the fig tree.

Read very carefully. Yesho the high priest is made clean of his sins. But what comes after this? He must walk in the Law of Yeue! Salvation is the cleansing of our iniquity and sin, but we must from that point, walk in the ways of Yeue. We must walk as the Messiah did. Yesho did believe, but more than belief is required. And we know this passage is speaking of the Messiah, for we know the Branch is He! This is what the Messiah came to do. Cleanse us, so that we could be blameless before the Father from that point on by keeping His Law.


  • Romans 3:21 But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets;

There would not be enough room in this section to quote every prophet's reference to the law; the many times the very reason given as to why Israel was scattered and divorced. Of course, this being a direct result of them breaking the law. Let us carefully inspect Saul's allegation. Saul most certainly claims to speak for Messiah, Acts 9, 22, 26. Does Saul also claim to speak for the Father? Saul is claiming to be a witness of God in Romans 1:9 and in many places in Romans chapter 2 as well. So yes. Saul claimed to speak on behalf of the Father. So let us test Saul by the law to see if he is indeed a false prophet or not.


Deuteronomy 13:1 If there arise among you a prophet, or a dreamer of dreams, and giveth thee a sign or a wonder, 2 And the sign or the wonder come to pass, whereof he spake unto thee, saying, Let us go after other gods, which thou hast not known, and let us serve them; 3 Thou shalt not hearken unto the words of that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams: for the LORD your God proveth you, to know whether ye love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul. 4 Ye shall walk after the LORD your God, and fear him, and keep his commandments, and obey his voice, and ye shall serve him, and cleave unto him. 5 And that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams, shall be put to death; because he hath spoken to turn you away from the LORD your God, which brought you out of the land of Egypt, and redeemed you out of the house of bondage, to thrust thee out of the way which the LORD thy God commanded thee to walk in. So shalt thou put the evil away from the midst of thee.


Did Saul claim to have a vision or dream? Oh most certainly. Did Saul claim to have a sign or wonder while on the Damascus road? Indeed he did. So this passage in Deuteronomy does apply to Saul. I hope the obvious has not escaped the reader. When the people seized Saul in Acts 6, they were indeed doing according to Deuteronomy. This fact escapes almost every bible student today because we do not even know the law ourselves. So, what makes us think we could spot a false prophet if the very criteria is not understood?


Romans 3:22 Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference:


James certainly said there was a difference between simply believing something and showing that by what we do. James 1:22 But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves. Our Messiah stated in Matthew 7:21 Not everyone that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Is there a difference? Should we judge between clean and unclean? Between holy and unholy? Leviticus 10:10 And that ye may put difference between holy and unholy, and between unclean and clean; If what Yesho said in Matthew 7 is correct, and I submit that it fits perfectly with the Old Testament, then there is a difference, Saul. Most certainly!


  • Roman 3:23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;

I believe we have covered this in detail above. But I will simply quote the words of the incredibly righteous prophet Isaiah; the man Messiah quoted more than any other prophet, Isaiah 1:16 Wash you, make you clean; put away the evil of your doings from before mine eyes; cease to do evil; 17 Learn to do well; seek judgment, relieve the oppressed, judge the fatherless, plead for the widow. 18 Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool. What was the whole point of Messiah's return? To redeem Israel! To make her blameless by teaching her the ways of the Father. And if we are to believe in the Revelation of our Messiah, how can there be perfect and upright men of each tribe in Revelation 7, if all fall short?


Who does the dragon make war against? It's not the Christians. It's not the Jews. It's the remnant of Israel who keep the law and who hold to the testimony of the Son of David. The woman in Revelation 12, is Israel and once you realize that the whole of the scripture narrative, begins to make sense. There is no third group called the church. Revelation 12:17 And the dragon was angry with the woman, and he went to make war with the rest of her children keeping the commandments of God and holding the testimony of Jesus. And he stood upon the sand of the sea. Can it be any more clear ladies and gentlemen?


  • Romans 3:24 Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:

The redemption was freely given, but we are justified by keeping the law Messiah kept. Following Messiah’s example is keeping the will of the Father, as he did. Doing the will of the Father, is keeping the Law of the Father, for he never changes. Can the reader find an example where the Father changes?


  • Rom 3:25 Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;

Was our Messiah righteous because he had faith? Or because he followed through and DID as the Father commanded of him? Not everyone that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Matthew 7:21 What if our Messiah came and was born [for all of you who wrongly worship a birthday] but did not follow through with what the Father commanded him. Would the Messiah have been blameless then? I have a simple question for Saul; And why call ye me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say? Luke 6:46 What does a true apostle say and teach the flock? Be doers of the word, and not hearers only. Otherwise, you are deceiving yourselves. James 1:22 Well now; I’d say we have a conflict between Saul and the apostles. Between Saul and the Messiah. Between Saul, and the truth.


  • Romans 3:26 To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus.

Ladies and gentlemen, there is no righteousness without the Law. There is no one just apart from the law. There is no faith without works. There are too many verses to quote here that attest to the law blessing those who keep it, and life comes from its blessings. No one was ever blessed by committing adultery. The law still applied even if not a single Christian keeps it.


  • Rom 3:27 Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith.

Saul believes that those who keep the law boast about living life the correct way. The Just One puts it perfectly; James 2:14 What does it profit, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can faith save him? 15 If a brother or sister is naked and destitute of daily food, 16 and one of you says to them, “Depart in peace, be warmed and filled,” but you do not give them the things which are needed for the body, what does it profit? 17 Thus also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead. 18 But someone will say, “You have faith, and I have works.” Show me your faith without your works, and I will show you my faith by my works. 19 You believe that there is one God. You do well. Even the demons believe—and tremble! 20 But do you want to know, O foolish man, that faith without works is dead?


James just called Saul a fool. Indeed, James is correct. Saul is a fool. Let me put it like this, without works, there is no fruit. And without fruit, that tree is worthless. A bad tree, or a person with no works, is cut down and burned in the fire. Matthew 7 is a very important chapter for study. I find it incredibly telling that in the same paragraph Yesho warns us of false prophets, he equates those with trees which bear bad fruit. False prophets can be known by their fruit. What is Saul’s fruit? Death, murder, rejection of the law, subversion, confusion, deception and lies. Ask yourselves, what would the Messiah do with a tree like that?


  • Rom 3:28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.

Saul and his followers make this conclusion, but not from the study of scripture. But from a depraved mind.


  • Rom 3:29 Is he the God of the Jews only? is he not also of the Gentiles? Yes, of the Gentiles also:

Here again we see this misnomer. The Jew and the gentile. I have previously shown that Abraham was a gentile and father of gentiles and that all his offspring were gentiles. This statement from Saul is the beginning of the ideas placed in the Talmud.


  • Rom 3:30 Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith.

And when a stranger shall sojourn with thee, and will keep the Passover to the LORD, let all his males be circumcised, and then let him come near and keep it; and he shall be as one that is born in the land: for no uncircumcised person shall eat thereof. One law shall be to him that is homeborn, and unto the stranger that sojourneth among you. Exodus 12:48-49


In that ye have brought into my sanctuary strangers, uncircumcised in heart, and uncircumcised in flesh, to be in my sanctuary, to pollute it, even my house, when ye offer my bread, the fat and the blood, and they have broken my covenant because of all your abominations. Ezekiel 44:7 This passage is describing the millennial reign of our King. And Yeue is quite clear about circumcision being of the utmost importance! Saul is claiming that uncircumcised will be justified by faith, however Ezekiel says the exact opposite. I do not recall Messiah calling out Ezekiel as a false prophet, do you? Therefore, it stands that we are to adhere to Ezekiel over Saul. Can any Christian deny this honestly?


  • Rom 3:31 Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.

And here lies the crux of the matter. This specific section is for the Hebrew rooters and those who teach and claim that Saul taught the Law and kept it. Saul is saying that faith is enough to fulfill the law. That those who only have faith are not breaking the law at all. In fact, they are establishing the law apart from works. Is that true? This is the passage Hebrew rooters use to say that Saul kept the Law. However, after studying the entire chapter in context, Saul is actually saying the opposite. Saul is teaching people they do not have to adhere to the perfect Law, Psalms 19:7. Simply that faith alone, no matter if they have repented or not, have fulfilled the law.