REBUTTAL TO EVIDENCE

Updated: 2 days ago

Life changing questions for the Christian world

Dedicated in loving memory to my beloved brother Nathan Henry Maurer, may you rest in peace son of Yeuda, and to the late Friedrich Wilhelm Kammeier


Introduction


The last several years have been quite an interesting series of realizations which have led me down some, how can I put this, taboo tunnels. These specific avenues of discovery which, according to the currently ruling established regime, are forbidden-at least forbidden for my particular Adamic tribe, the Deutsch. Much of what I have found however, does not exist in a vacuum and I always look for ways to apply information I have learned in this ever-ubiquitous beast system of lies. These truths are forbidden from various so-called Western European tribes, as well as the masses in general because knowledge is indeed power. Is there really such a thing as protected freedom of thought and speech? There is a reason why the people today who are descended from Jacob (the OT specifically) are known by other names. European, German, Celt, Nordic peoples. You know these people quite well if you have spent any amount of time in the Law and the Prophets. They are the people of the promise. But I do not refer to what is today known as the Jew. The following work will be a compilation of my discoveries and perspective placed (as best as I can figure) in their proper context and to whom they are for. My people. My volk. Yshral and Yeuda.


This work is not simply going to be a typical atheistic attack on Christianity. I wish to make that abundantly clear. The perspective that I bring will be that of a child of Yeuda (Deutsch) and one which is virtually unknown to the world at large-that of the extreme value of the original language of the OT. It contains many hidden treasures which are just waiting to be sought out. I love my people and many of them, Germanic Nordic Celtic tribes, happen to be Christian. This is why I am taking the time to write this. Many Christians in very recent years, are of many kinds of non-Adamic races (negroids, Asiatics and the like). This is not written for them, nor do I concern myself with proving anything to them. They are not my focus. This work is also for those of my tribe who do not have a Christian mindset and see its many problems. This work I hope, will help them to understand just why there are holes in Christianity, because all religions have holes. Yes, Christianity is a religion and this concept which will be covered later. My hope for the non-Christian volk who read this, will be that they finally understand who they are and turn back to the Father. Whether Christian European or Pagan, I simply ask for the chance to do so. I am not being paid to do this and wouldn’t have it any other way. I simply desire to do my part in exposing the true reality of our world and the lies we have been force fed to keep us (so-called Western Europeans) under the curses of Deuteronomy 28, though the problems we face are anything but simple.


These curses have been inaccurately claimed by various groups, as is with the case of Negroid Jewish identity groups (whom I find to be extremely militant against my people-the Deutsch Celtic Nordics) and Adamic Jews in general. Contrary to popular propaganda, Jews are not even remotely homogenous. Even some of these so-called Jews have mixed with aboriginals (non-Adamics of various kinds) over the years and are no longer Adamic. They are as a whole, quite mixed in the broadest sense. The best way I know how to describe them is as follows: a worldwide iron grip and coalition of all the enemies of my people spoken of in the OT (with some admixture from non-Adamic kinds) united in one cause-to keep my people enslaves and ignorant of the true Word and to hold the ground they have won from us. So, I use the term Jew is most lose sense possible. These people also know the importance of inheritance and covenants. They know that if we as Yshral begin to keep the law as the Father commands, then their iron grip upon us would melt away. That is why they have invested hundreds of years and billions of dollars in keeping us ignorant! For if covenants did not matter today, then please dear reader, explain the vast and over-reaching propaganda machine and overabundance of lies which have a single goal: to keep us ignorant of the OT. What is the point, if all humanity has access to the covenants of Jacob? It is very important to accurately identify the races of people today. Ethnology is a study which has been eradicated in the educational system (replaced by anthropology-which is not the same thing) for a reason. If the races of people (or as the Father describes them: kinds) do not know who they are, they are easily manipulated. We have seen this play out in stark clarity just in the last few years alone.


I was given a challenge by my father, Robert Lee Maurer, to refute Josh MacDowell’s book, Evidence that Demands a Verdict, which is essentially a reference guide focusing on the Christian study of apologetics. I love my father very much. He is my volk and this work is for him and my people as a whole. I cannot stress that enough. This book (with all due respect, key word: due, is not for Negroids, Asiatics, and any other various aboriginal savage people of the earth) is for my people! If anyone else wished to read it, that is their prerogative of course, just know from the beginning: it’s not for those kinds of people. This work was precipitated from a lengthy debate/discussion with my father on the bible: who it was truly written for and by, what language it was originally written in (not Hebrew or as Jonathan Machtemes calls Jew-brew), and how historical the NT actually turns out to be. I have come to learn my true genetic identity as a Yshralite, or Deutsche as in of Yeuda, of the southern kingdom (please see 1 Kings chapter 11 as to the reason the kingdoms were split to begin with). With the help of Jonathan, who has conducted extensive research in learning the true meanings of the original inherent and built-in essence of the characters he calls glyph sets, which are quite similar to our English and Germanic letters today, I have perhaps learned a more regarding my own surname.

Maurer. Aur in the original characters of what we call the Old Testament, Obry (The word which Jews created the term Hebrew from) from our forefather Ober, may possibly mean ‘light.’ Jonathan has ascertained that the M in Obry denotes frequency which when looking at this symbol, is quite plausible. The word Mart in Genesis 1:14 refers to the lights that Yeue our Father placed in the heavens. The suffix -er at the end of my surname could very well mean ‘someone/something which does.’ So, the German surname Maurer could very well mean ‘light maker/giver’ based on what has been discovered thus far with Obry. Consistency is the key in old languages. Ambiguity only serves those who wish to hide or change a language. Abstract thoughts and concepts are also not consistent with what we see in nature, in the Father’s law, or in any other aspect concerning Him. Of course, this meaning of my surname is not yet set in stone, as we are still learning much about our forefathers’ language. But it’s a start. This is what I currently know thus far in time and hope to build upon it as my understanding becomes more in tune with the Father's will. I share this (to encourage my Volk to look into this regarding own surnames) to be transparent and to share with others so that they might learn something of their own family which cannot be found discusses in any other circle.

I come from a German farming family. Poor and traditionally of the Christian persuasion. The term Christian up until quite recently, denoted a very genetic connotation. When older books referenced Christians, they were only speaking of Western Europeans in general. There was no, for example, Negroid Christian, Arab Christian, or Asiatic Christian. This would have been utterly laughable! Even for me to this day, I find it ludicrous to consider anyone other than someone from the Adamic race, to be Christian. Pure insanity! These people of non-Adamic tribes clearly do not have a genuine and honest grasp on reality, nor true history. Many Adamics do not either, however the differences between Adamic and non-Adamic is inherent. Adamics have abilities that non-Adamics do not have and cannot be taught. Which is why after how many years of attempting to evangelize Africa, it’s still not the West is it? Afghanistan was the crowning jewel of Western culture succeeding amongst Arab peoples. And how did that experiment turn out dear volk? The bible is indeed a White man’s book cover to cover!


I will do my utmost to summarize the last several years in terms of my paradigm shift.


Epistemology is a practice I have known very little about in the past, least of which something to consciously and actively be participating in. I encourage the reader to take the time to evaluate their own. Truths I now hold dear, are based upon superior information, and because of that (and also due to the fact that most people cannot define their epistemology with clarity or intention) many conclusions I have come to would perhaps seem incredulous, by those who have not learned how to think, do not know why they believe what they do, and who are quite illiterate. In fact, the opposite is true. I spend a great deal of time deliberately critical thinking and evaluating my stance on a great many topics. Nothing I have now come to believe is by accident or based on any kind of propaganda. Those who would accuse me of this, I simply ask them to produce said propaganda.


I will be sharing some insight pertaining to the mainstream historical world narrative we (the nations-and no I do not include aboriginal savages of the non-Adamic races to be nations) find ourselves enslaved to both mentally and physically. This paradigm shift regarding race began at the end of 2019, with the viewing of the documentary called Europa: The Last Battle. In turn, this viewing (which filled me both with absolute grief and fierce indignation), led me on long painful realization that everything I was taught in school about people and their origin, was a lie. There are many books which describe this reality regarding the differences in races and the kinds of people and I am certainly not the first to speak of it. It is also not entirely unknown even among the masses today. Any group which understands the differences in human kinds, are simply labeled White supremist extremists. Ethnology is the study of the innate differences among the many races of humans.


My Germanic history and its timeline of historical events are such that most are not honestly educated on. This is no accident. The documentary mentioned above led me to discover writers, whom I consider heroic: David Irving, Michael Hoffman, Nesta H. Webster, Arthur R. Butz, Eustace Mullins, James von Brunn, Fred A. Leuchter, Germer Rudolf, and Michael Collins Piper, just to name a few. I do not necessarily agree with each of these writers’ conclusions per say, but they do, and have done, their utmost to lay out the data and facts, as well as it is humanly possible to do given the information currently available to us. Several of them have been abused, thrown in jail, and in the case of Michael Collins Piper, brutally murdered.

Upon learning that Germans/Deutsch as well as other Yshralite tribes like Celts and Nordic peoples, were indeed the targets of both great wars in the 20th century, and ultimately the real victims (not the so-called Jews nor any non-Adamic savage), the people of the book have been hiding in plain sight all along, today mainly known as Western European. They are the descendants of the people made a covenant with YUEU at Mt Horeb (not in Arabia). The apple of Yeue’s eye. Yshral (no, not Israel) being all the tribes which came from Yoqb, or Jacob. Yes, there is a difference between the modern state of Israel (Is-not-real) and the biblical Yshral of the Law and the Prophets. To this day, it floors me to think what my people have been through. It breaks my heart continually each and every day because I see my people making the same mistakes we have made from the beginning. Idolatry, rebellion against staying pure genetically, and this misplaced love (lust?) for other nations and their cultures-Yeue calls it whoring after them. The kinds of attacks our people have endured for so long, ‘White’ (which is simply Yshralite) slavery, usury slavery, the orphan trains were of Yshralite children, the absolute onslaught of anti-German propaganda finally all made sense to me. As a child I always felt guilty for being German due to the public school's extreme anti-German conditioning camps we were forced to participate in. Part of the course was to recreate a death camp of our choice as a visual art project. There are two types of historical reenactment activities with which Americans engage in that I know of: holocaustianity and the civil war battles. One must ask why? The truth is that these two events in history resulted in countless numbers of Yshralites slaughtered. It's as if the regime who rules our world today mocks us with these spectacles.


So, I discovered that Adm is a kind. Like a cat is a kind. Or a robin is a kind. Like a negroid is a kind. Yes. There are many kinds of humans, we know today as races. A specific race of people, out of the broader Adme in Genesis 1, were then created in Genesis 2 to govern and righteously rule over Yeue’s creation. These Adamics spread out and over time developed into various tribes. Not all so-called White people are of the same tribes. The very enemies of Yshral were and are to this day, also White. Stating this fact, angers many people. I have met those who understand that the Jewish holocaust and the anti-German propaganda accompanying this, to be a lie. They have, however, simply replaced Jesus with Hitler, and this is also idolatry. Why is it that my people are so quick to make an idol out of someone and worship them? They do not see it that way, of course, but it is worship, nonetheless. Do I subscribe to the idea that Hitler killed a bunch of Jews? No, I do not. I do not however, idolize Hitler, as the White supremist would have me do. But that is a topic for another time.

This distinct kind or race called Adm, was created in Genesis two apart from the peoples created Genesis one, and they were given dominion and true history plays this out. This truth has not been properly taught for hundreds of years. Intentionally so. These are some of the gems one can find when the OT is thoroughly studied. It is also another reason why this work is not for non-Adamics. I do not wish to cast these pearls to wolves, as it were. Now that I am able to correctly understand these kinds from Genesis one and two, genetic racial difference in Negroids, Asiatics, and Arabs, become extremely vivid and unavoidable. This innate biblical information has had a much greater impact on me: more so even than when I learned that the Law of the Father is for us today through the work of Rob Skiba, to which and with all due respect, I must now discard. As well as many like him, L.A. Marzulli, Zen Garcia, John Pounders, David Carrico, Zachery Bauer, just to name a few. Men I once thought were on the right track. Of course, gate keepers must have at least some truths in their message for them to gain a following. I do not know for certain if these men are gatekeepers, shills or simply misinformed? Bauer is a German name similar to my own and so Zachary may in fact be of my own volk. I have yet to successfully contact him unfortunately to share with him some important information. If any of these men do stumble upon this document, they can go to the contact page on my site. The Scripture of the Old Testament, or as I prefer to call it, the Law, and the Prophets, is a text for a specific genetic kind of people. The Adamic race. This will be discussed in length.


I learned from Jonathan’s papers called Euphrates: A Problem with Geography, The Patriarchs, Their Livestock, the Land, and The Land of Amry, of the absolute nonsensical claim that the bible lands took place in what is today called Palestine. Yet one more lie, force-fed to the world-to deceive and disorient Yshral. I cannot express how highly I recommend reviewing these documents! I have known for some time that the law of the Father is for Yshral, but when I learned that Adm was a specific kind and specifically created to rule and govern over all the rest of creation in a place much vaster and more purpose built for the Adamic people, the various agendas that have been created in the Western world, began to melt away. Genesis 2:5 … and there was no [Eadm] to [serve-govern?] the [Eadamy]. This is a much more accurate representation of Genesis 2:5. These multicultural, one-race cock and bull narratives are not pushed in Japan. They not pushed in China. They are not pushed in India. They are not pushed in the Arab world. They are pushed where our people, the Yshralite people, live and thrive. Of course, the Palestinian-Bible lands theory is pushed everywhere simply because it benefits those behind it and the Adamics who rule the world wish to keep the servant races under their thumb. Yes, Adamics do rule the world to this day. It also helps those we call Jew, to have the Arabs believing they are Ishmael and ready to take up arms (of which we ourselves have amply supplied them with) against us and murder any so-called White man they are commanded to by our own government. These enemies if Yshral also simultaneously, and quite happily I might add, ships these militant non-Adamics to America. One of the curses fathers of Yshral now must witness, is their daughters mating with beasts.

Genesis 2:7 should read more like this: “And Yeue Adny formed [Eadm] of the [Opr] of the [Eadme] and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and [Eadm] became a living soul.” Adam was created out of what is a more general term, the Adame and was created for a very specific purpose. The prophets foretold of one day, the people of Yeue, would wake up and learn who they were and repent of their evil.

  • Ezekiel 36:31 “Then shall ye remember your own evil ways, and your doings that were not good, and shall lothe yourselves in your own sight for your iniquities and for your abominations.”

  • Jeremiah 31:33 “But this is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares Yeue. I will put My law in their minds and inscribe it on their hearts. And I will be their God, and they will be My people.

The purpose of the introduction given, was to supply the reader with a short synopsis of why I am writing this rebuttal and the kinds of information which has shifted my paradigm of the world, of history, and of my people. Those being Deutsche, or the German race (with a little Celtic and Norwegian in smaller amounts, but mostly Germanic). The concepts I am referring to in this introduction will be sufficiently dealt with in this work and in future sections. I will be using the KJV when referencing verses for the simple fact that it is coded to Strong’s, not because I believe it to be inerrant. All OT verses are specifically read by Christians through a traditional Christian lens, but not necessarily the correct lens. The old saying “The Old Testament is the New Testament concealed, and the New Testament is the Old Testament revealed,” has a single aim-to amputate any argument anyone may have to use the Old Testament in its own right! One cannot ever read the Old Testament without the strict controlled narrative of the NT lens laid on top. These texts which are claimed to record a real historical event, the NT text, will be examined. And if this real and historical event turns out to have never taken place, nor cannot it be irrefutable proven to have taken place; it being specifically the birth, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, then Christianity in all intents and purposes, would necessarily be a false religion and the largest one in all of human history.


Basic Surface-level Information Regarding the Author in Question: Josh MacDowell


It is important to know something about the person who has written such an influential work, Evidence that Demands a Verdict, and how successful they are in this world controlled by evil men. Aside from the fact that the reviews at the front of the book appear to be nothing but an echo chamber (scholars simply agreeing with and congratulating each other on being masters and elders, teaching the stupid masses what they must think and understand about the world), I find MacDowell’s reinforcement of the world approved version of the current historical narrative, repugnant to say the least. Here is a summary of Josh MacDowell which I found on Amazon. Yes, the same site which supports homosexuality, BLM, abortion, feminism, and condones the rape and murder of 66 million Adamic Russians (whom many were actually ethnic Germans) and (from my personal estimations based on various readings, though I do admit is an estimation) not to mention the 30+ million Germans in the 20th century alone, murdered. They honor this author with the following statement:


“Josh McDowell is the founder and president of Josh McDowell Ministry (A Cru Ministry). He has written or co-authored 152 books in 128 languages, including the multi-million selling More Than a Carpenter and Evidence That Demands a Verdict (named one the twentieth century’s top 40 books by World Magazine). He has addressed more than 45 million people, giving over 27,000 talks in 139 countries. In spite of all the honors and awards he has received; Josh will tell anyone that his greatest joys and pleasures come from his family. He and his wife Dottie have been married 50 years. They have four children and eleven grandchildren.”


What does the scriptures tell us in Proverbs 29:27? An unjust man is detestable to the righteous, and one whose way is upright is detestable to the wicked. Is the world wicked? Well in the NT, it says that a Christian will be hated for “his names sake,” Matthew 10:22. So why then, is it that MacDowell and many like him, are loved by the world and receive awards and all kinds of favors from the world establishment? These theologians travel all over America and Europe, invited to various universities and institutions to speak, and receive a considerable reward for their services. The question as to how these men can be so loved and revered by the world, acquiring a great amount of wealth at the same, when the very NT they defend states that they will be hated for his name’s sake, is a serious problem Christians deliberately overlook?


In various savage lands, Christians are murdered and killed, and this is interpreted at proof that Christians will suffer for Christ. But is it truly due to the fact that these savages reject the notion that a man rose from the dead “2000 years ago? Or is it because these evangelists are White? Again, it’s a question that deserves a serious answer. The plain data, that savages murder white men in third world lands and lands where they have been sent in by the tens of millions, can be and have been interpreted falsely. I encourage my volk to test this out a bit further and not take the religious establishments word for it.


I do not hear of Chinese evangelists going to Spain to help White Spaniards come to know Christ. Today Spain is known to be less than 2% Christian, and all of Europe is steadily going in that direction. It seems that the evidence that White people in general are attacked in non-Adamic nations, not because they are Christian (many Whites are murdered who are not Christian) but because they are fair skinned. I have never once heard of a collective group of African Negroid or Chinese or Arab led Christians going to Spain to evangelize the poor White Spaniards. I have never heard of these so-called Chinese Christian I hear so much about, going to evangelize like New York or Detroit where there is very few Christians. Are there any Chinese Christians traveling to Arabia in order evangelize the Arabs? Utterly absurd! The only people who travel to evangelize are White Adamic led groups and they NEVER go to historically White nations. Even if there is an all-non-White evangelist group traveling for the express purpose of preaching Jesus, who funds them? Was this vision organized by Adamics or non-Adamics? Really think about this for it most certainly matters. Of course, knee-jerk reactions from adolescent adults simply will not due. I have never heard a sufficient explanation for the observations stated above, other than the obvious-that Christianity is solely spread, funded and organized by White people. The answer as to why is equally obvious. Christianity is purpose made for White people, particularly Yshral. Perhaps the increasing onslaught against White people is why Jews are not so inclined to claim they are White as they once were-to save their own skin. The golem they created will come back to haunt them, for this non-White propaganda is of their own making. I once again remind the reader, that I refer to non-homogenous Jew extremely loosely. I simply do not see, nor experience Christians being killed in the streets of Adamic nations, like they are in savage lands. Of course, places in Europe with huge numbers of non-Adamics cannot be an accurate example simply because the people murdering Christians there are again, non-Adamic immigrants! I have even met Nordic pagans who are quite civil to their Christian cousins and often time, of their own genetic kin. I would like the reader to consider the very real possibility that it is in the nature of a savage to revert to type and kill, because it is part of their genetics. It’s in their nature. Which would explain why still to this day, Africa, China, India, and other savages still have not taken to Christianity as Aryan Adamic nations have. And I do make the distinction between nation and savage lands. Non-Adamics do not and cannot have nations without Adamics giving them the semblance of such. I encourage the reader to explore this further on their own. The point being: that the Christian narrative found in the NT text, has been geared for, not savage peoples, but for Aryan Adamic peoples, in particular the so-called Western Europeans. For the simple fact that these people are descendants of Yoqb Yshral (Jacob). Could it be that Spain is less Christian because there are hardly any Yshralites living there today as there once were? It’s a very real possibility.

Josh MacDowell has made a fortune selling his books. Regardless of how someone wishes to justify that, the fact remains that he and his family have become extremely wealthy (assuming they were not always wealthy). Josh MacDowell does use people despite his claim that he does not. He has received fame and fortune due to his traditional Christian values, where he would not have had he remained an atheist (again, assuming his Christian origin story is true). But the extreme majority of people do not become that wealthy by converting to Christianity. Poor people all over this earth buy MacDowell’s book fully believing in him. Suspending their critical thinking skills and trusting that this man is telling the truth. This man has a very posh and comfortable life living on the backs of poor Christians who have bought his book and apply its values to their life. Josh MacDowell also reinforced the official historical narrative of the Germans being the enemy in both world wars, black slavery, and that the Roman Empire existed as we are told. I also highly suspect that he was financed in the beginning; for what humble college party animal from a poor farming family in Michigan, has the money to simply take a break from school and travel the U.S. and Europe for months, simply because a group of people he barely knew at the time, challenged him to disprove something he already claimed to adamantly reject in the first place? If, however he was financed honestly from his own hard work, I simply invite Josh MacDowell to inform his supporters how he did so. They after all, deserve to know how honest their apologist is.

I have been attempting to write my own books and it is taking me quite a long time considering I have no financier, no resources, barely any time, and I work on average 9 to 10 hours a day in a physically laborious slave job five days a week to keep a roof over my family’s heads and to feed my son and mother, whom I financially support. Certainly, MacDowell’s father couldn’t have supported his college career or his world exploits, considering his vocation was the town drunk as MacDowell claims. So, I would like to know how this man, going to law school and flying all over the world, was financed? I believe I deserve to know the answer this question if he is going to be as influential as he has become over my genetic kinsfolk and personal family! I add however, after having a conversation with my father concerning the cost of living in the 50’s and 60’s, travel expenses and room and board may have been more affordable. Very well. I will give Josh MacDowell this benefit of the doubt on this point.


The Section Called ‘He Changed My Life’


MacDowell begins this chapter with a quote from Thomas Aquinas. He is purported to have lived in the 13 century and was part of a secret society known as the Dominicans, which were also called Jacobins. Now, the Jacobins were a group of horrid filthy Jews (many incognito and many not Ashkenazi) who incited the French Revolution (among other revolutions), which resulted in the slaughter of scores of Yshralite people. Jacobins were known to root out heresy, except they arbitrarily defined just what heresy was-doctrine that opposed the official church narrative at any given time, and it did change throughout the history of Christendom. They were responsible for mass slaughter of people, mostly Germanic Celtic Nordic peoples. So, this man whom MacDowell decided to quote in the beginning of his book regarding apologetics, was a murderer and most likely of Sephardic extraction-as many Catholic inquisitors known by various names and always in one secret society or another, were known to be. I find it odd. I will give MacDowell the benefit of the doubt here once again, and assume he had no idea how despicable Aquinas truly was.


Regarding the quote, itself. “There is within every soul a thirst for happiness and meaning.” By soul, does Aquinas mean the heart? We certainly have a thirst for human comfort and enjoyment. Certainly, we wish to believe our life has meaning as well. What child does not want these things? However, at some point, one must grow up and smell the roses. Life is not all about feelings and catering to them and our various whimsical emotional states. The Father teaches us self-control and makes it quite clear through the prophets that His law will be written upon the hearts of his people. Those people being the genetic seed of Jacob alone: the northern kingdom and the southern kingdom (1 Kings 11) will one day become one (Ezekiel 37).

  • Jeremiah 31:31 Behold, the days come, saith Yeue, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Yshral, and with the house of Yeuda: 32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Mitzry; which my covenant THEY brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith Yeue: 33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Yshral; After those days, saith Yeue, I will put my law in their inward parts, and WRITE it in their hearts; and will be their Alym, and they shall be MY people.

Happiness is not really the focus of the Law and the Prophets. The NT is an entirely different animal and one which will certainly be dealt with. Meaning is found in the Law and which kind of people someone is born into determined their meaning; for humanity is neither equal nor homogenous. For if humanity was created equal, everyone would look and think the same. It’s as plane as the color in ones’ own skin, however we have become programmed to not see the distinctions between the races of Adamites and the various aboriginal races created in Genesis 1. The point is that the meaning of someone’s life, is determined by the Father and we ought to respect his orderly and hierarchal creation. For if all men were created equal, why then is the tribe of Yshral the apple of Yeue’s eye? Why then was Adm given rulership over all others created in Genesis 1? There is an order to the creation. I will once again give MacDowell the benefit of the doubt here and conclude that he only quoted a murderous lawbreaker, allegedly named Aquinas, to explain what his aspirations as a young man were, and not any hidden admiration for the degenerate 13th century Jacobin.


“Where I was brought up, everyone seemed to be into religion. Because I thought maybe I would find my answers in being religious, I started attending church—a lot”-Josh MacDowell


MacDowell associated Christianity with religion, and he was correct to do so. Christians believe that the ten commandments are good and holy, and yet each week due to religious fervor, they intentionally break the fourth commandment so constantly and consistently. The Christian religion even goes so far as to justify the act of breaking the Sabbath. The Sabbath is more important than simply a commandment. It is actually singled out as a covenant in its own right:

  • Exodus 31:16 “Wherefore the children of Yshral shall keep the sabbath, to observe the sabbath throughout their generations, for a perpetual covenant. 17 It is a sign between me and the children of Yshral forever; for in six days Yeue made heaven and earth, and on the seventh day he rested, and was refreshed.”

Now, it is believed that Isaiah prophesied the virgin birth of Jesus, which I will get to in future sections, so it would stand to reason that he would also prophecy that the Sabbath would either be changed or done away with completely, if we are to be intellectually honest. However, we read this in Isaiah:

  • Isaiah 58:13-14 “If you turn back your foot to the Sabbath, from doing your pleasure on my holy day, and call the Sabbath a delight and the holy day of Yeue honorable; if you honor it, not going your own ways, or seeking your own pleasure, or talking idly; then you shall take delight in Yeue, and I will make you ride on the heights of the earth; I will feed you with the heritage of Jacob your father, for the mouth of Yeue has spoken.”

Yeue has indeed spoken! I bring this up many times and the implications cannot be ignored any longer. Christians would agree with the following statement: the idea that Jesus kept the law perfectly and fulfilling it to the letter. How is it then, that he can thereby change the Sabbath to Sunday? Or do away with it completely? This is breaking that law and there is no way around it. Either Jesus kept the law perfectly and kept the Sabbath and upheld it as an essential part of life, or he broke it and was not the perfect sacrificial lamb. Christians cannot have their cake and eat it too! Of course, he never stated such a notion, and yet Christians seem to parrot this talking point so incessantly. The children of Yshral being the physical genetic sons and daughters of Yoqb (Jacob), are still under the Sabbath covenant and this long preceded any birth of the son of Yeue, namely Jesus. And there is not a single verse in either the OT or the NT, which eradicates this covenant. What the NT does is insinuate the idea that the law is done away with. In a very real way, the NT is a stumbling block to Yshral. “A sign between me and the children of Yshral forever…” is not done away with by modern dogma no matter how many people believe it. A tree is green even if everyone claims it is blue. A sign. Stop and consider this concept. Roll it over in your mind. A sign marks out someone or a group of people. Qyn (not Cain) was marked out so that he was distinct and noticeable. A sign in Genesis 4:15, was he not? People would know just by observing him, that he was different, whatever this mark was. Of course, the Jews have their Talmudic rituals and child sacrifices which they perform on the seventh day of the week, but it can easily be discovered with even a superficial study, that despite their propaganda, they fit none of the prophecies of the Law and Prophets (except by means of purely superficial sophistry). Sunday worship is celebrated by billions and marks no one out as peculiar. What marks people out as different is those Yshralites who have turned back to the and keep Sabbath. There are no 3 billion people keeping the Sabbath I can assure the reader of that regardless of which day of the week it is-and we are not even certain about that.

Josh MacDowell says that he was raised on a farm. There are many Dutch farmers in Michigan. Not to be confused with Deutsch. And because he could not find any answers he sought after them in both organized religious circles and educational institutions, which are both controlled by the same people. This is why they feel the same. They are the same. A back-and-forth shuffle. The Christians who leave the church, find a home in the secular lawless mainstream catch all. And in the reverse, those who become fed up with secularism, find a church (this phenomenon is less documented, but it happens quite often) and find the trinity God-they find Jesus. Both sides of the coin controlled by the same people at the top. The differences are superficial only. They deter or distract Yshral from really learning for themselves, testing the data apart from the controllers. A few have done so, only to be judged and rejected by both Christendom and secularism. It’s a cycle, but it’s neither natural nor is it benevolent. Its purpose is not to deceive the world, but to destroy Yshral. That is and has always been the goal. Any other lives lost or deceived are simply collateral damage. Necessary losses to achieve the end goal-our ultimate destruction.


Most of the people MacDowell describes are everyday cattle-mindless beasts who do none of their own thinking. No better than animals. He is right to describe his life as hell with no meaning at that point. I agree completely. Many people today, the vast majority have meaningless lives. Why? Life today is not filled with truth, but junk. All manner of junk. Some of it looks quite good, but junk, nonetheless. MacDowell then finds eight people who he perceives as being different and as having conviction. I have met people with conviction. I have met a pagan witch with very strong conviction who was also quite intelligent. I have met Aryan pagans with equal conviction and very strong-willed. These people turned out to be quite kind as well. Kind to others. But when crossed, they were set ablaze with their strong convictions. The point being here is that any kind of person, Adamic or not, can have conviction. Stalin, had conviction, and helped to murder 66 million Aryan Russians, many of which were my own ethnic volk. Conviction alone is proof of nothing, other than the strong will given to man by the Father. MacDowell fails to mention anything about these people’s beliefs except that they were strong believers in traditional Christian dogma-that Jesus was born of a virgin, that he was the son of God and Lord, and that he rose again after being crucified. And that all of humanity is under sin and the only way to receive this essential salvation, is through Jesus Christ. I grew up in Christianity. I have been a Christian my entire life. I know the doctrine well. But is this doctrine true? Let’s just say for now that I do not write this book for enjoyment, nor to reinforce any established narrative. I do it because truth matters. I do it because I love my people enough to tell them the absolutely (as opposed to relative) truth. That they live in idolatry! If this is offensive to people, I say that truth does not care about someone’s whimsical feelings. That truth does indeed set us free to think for ourselves and not be malleable to our enemies. By our I mean specifically my own genetic kin. I cannot emphasize this enough and will remind the reader throughout the book.


“There is a certain dynamic in the lives of people with deep convictions, and I enjoy being around people with that dynamic, even if their beliefs differ from mine.”-Josh MacDowell


I tend to agree with this statement. I certainly do not wish to be around ignorant people. Debate is also quite healthy, which is why it is not encouraged in the educational institutions. Anything good and healthy is harshly controlled by both secular and Christian circles. What MacDowell says next I find quite interesting. He says that he noticed some people who appeared to have conviction, but also that they seemed disgustingly happy and had something that he didn’t have, and that it was constant. Well, my question is this: how can one know that someone’s happiness is constant if they just met them? How long had he known these people? To determine if someone’s happiness is constant, should be based on two factors as far as I can tell: One, is their state of living stable and uninterrupted? Is their life comfortable to the point where they are satisfied? It is easy to be in a state of consistent happiness when nothing bad or extremely stressful is happening in one’s life, or there is no sudden changes, like a death in the family, an illness, loss of income, etc. Two, that you believe you know all there is to know about the world; its history and timeline of major world events, it dynamic, its calendar, the way politics, government, and finance function, etc. Christians believe the church history that has been handed to them without question. The happiness and conviction of the extreme majority in this world today, are based on these two factors. Because happiness is not dependent on truth, but how you feel and believe (true or not) and your current state of existence. Truth is not relative, or it could not be called truth. Is happiness the end goal? When I read the Old Testament, I do not see that as the goal.


In short, how did MacDowell know that this happiness he perceived was not based on the two factors described above? If so, well, either it’s not true happiness, or happiness is simply an emotion-changing with the tide. There is something to the saying, “You do not truly know someone unless you have lived with them.” MacDowell does say that this small group of people were very kind to one another and genuinely loved each other. That may have been true. I would not dispute that. This, however, does not prove number one, that Jesus is God or that he existed. It does not prove Christianity as being based on a historical fact, for there are many people, pagans, Atheists, Muslims who have groups of friends and loved ones whom they love very much and even treat others with great kindness. I am not attempting to downplay these people. I do not know anything about them (due to the vague nature in which MacDowell wrote about them). I am simply saying that these behaviors described by MacDowell are not proof of anything. He then becomes friends with these people he believes are consistently happy. He asked one of the girls, “what changed your life?” She says that it was Jesus Christ. I have said this myself many times. What I have an issue with here is that there is no elaboration on the part of this girl, as to how he changed her life. Did she repent of her sin, realize that the law is for Yshral today and begin reading about the Father so she could please Him and honor Him? Well, the book does not say how her life was changed. It only says that she had conviction and was consistently happy.


When I used to tell people that Jesus Christ changed my life, it would mean I had an inner peace that no matter what happened to me physically, that when I pass on, I knew that I would be with the Lord. That I am a born-again Christian who worships Jesus and one day all will bow down to him and worship him. That I now follow the teaching of Jesus-which includes the following but not limited to; not judging others, not getting angry or cursing, if attacked turning the other cheek, giving away all I have if need be to the church, if someone asks for something I am to give regardless of what I have, forgiving others no matter what they have done wrong, and sharing the gospel with anyone of any race and not discriminate against anyone. So, I agree, becoming a Christian can indeed change one’s life. The question I have is this: is that change good and true according to the law and the prophets? Many of these concepts I listed do indeed sound virtuous. They will be elaborated on at length later on.


MacDowell is now faced with a challenge from knew friends (of which he only knew for about two weeks at this point):


“Then my new friends issued me a challenge I couldn’t believe. They challenged me, a pre-law student, to make a rigorous, intellectual examination of the claims of Jesus Christ: that he is God’s Son; that he inhabited a human body and lived among real men and women; that he died on the cross for the sins of humanity; that he was buried and was resurrected three days later; and that he is still alive and can change a person’s life even today.”


MacDowell rejects the challenge for days, despite his new friends continuing to hammer him with it. He finally has enough and accepts. He decides to write a book proving Christianity false. This is where the story becomes quite extraordinary. This man, from a simple farming family, his father being the town drunk, a pre-law student, now accepts this challenge to prove Christianity false; something he claims he already emphatically believes to be a joke. We are not told how he is paying for his trek across America and Europe either. I had a long discussion with my father recently on this very subject. How was it that so many of these theologians and apologists were able finance their travel expenses, food and lodging, and any other living expenses that would inevitably occur? My father explained that it was much more affordable to travel during the 50’s and 60’s. That many Europeans people were extremely benevolent to others and aided those who were in need by providing living accommodations and sustenance. Perhaps even the university funded his academic leave. This may have in fact been quite possible. So, as I said previously, I will extend the benefit of the doubt to Josh MacDowell for this unexplained reality he indeed must have faced in his early years.

“At the end of my journey in Europe, I found myself sitting in a museum library in London, England. After several hours of research studying some out-of-print books, I leaned back in my chair, rubbed my eyes, and without remembering I was in a quiet library, I spoke out loud, “It’s true. It’s true! It’s really true!” It was about 6:30 p.m. when I left the library. As I walked along those London streets, I realized that there was no escaping the facts: the Bible is true, the resurrection of Christ really did happen, and Jesus is who he claimed to be.” These indisputable facts that Jesus is God’s son, he says.


MacDowell does not mention which book he was reading. MacDowell does not mention what evidence he has come across which swayed him to the other side. MacDowell later did not even drop to his knees and pray and ask Jesus to come into his heart. I would like to know just what book he was reading and what research he had discovered which changed the mind of an adamant opponent of Christianity so quickly. He claims that he could not escape the facts. Which facts? There was a little voice inside his head MacDowell writes, which said to him: “Josh, you don’t have a leg to stand on.” Why? Why did he not have a leg to stand on? Didn’t he just get finished concluding that he could not escape the facts and that Jesus was a historical figure? How could that be true if he then says he doesn’t have a leg to stand on? This story is all very vague! Let’s be intellectually honest here for a moment. If MacDowell found such incredible definitive evidence and facts to support the NT narrative, then why didn’t stay at the library gathered it and writing nonstop until he finished his book of evidence? Instead, he went on a leisurely walk hearing a voice which said he didn’t “have a leg to stand on?”

MacDowell describes this conflict he had. Perhaps that is true with many others who become Christians. But here is what I wish to point out in the following quote regarding historical facts vs an experience: “You may think it was the irrefutable intellectual and historical evidence that brought me to Christ. No, the evidence was only God’s way of getting his foot in the door of my life. What brought me to Christ was the realization that he loved me enough to die for me.”


Quite odd. MacDowell has just spent some months doing research to conclude that the NT narrative is an indisputable fact, and yet those facts are not why he accepted Christ and became a Christian. Very odd indeed. This phenomenon is quite common among Christians however, and I have heard it almost verbatim many times before from other people. Someone may say, “How do you know you became a Christian?” That’s a fair question. Here is the simple answer: “I was there!” Just as we are to take Saul’s word that he was not lying so we are to believe the testimonies of people claiming that Jesus saved them and that he is God in the flesh. The only proof that MacDowell could tell someone who questions him, is his own word. I’m sure at some point however, we will see this mountain of evidence I have heard so much about.


The Problem with Sin

The second point which MacDowell confesses is that he is a sinner. Well, what exactly is a sinner? Let’s explore sin for a while because it is a daunting task to say the least. This word and concept is not just one word and one concept. I have found 14 different words translated as sin in the OT. And due to the nature of the material, I have compiled a chart of Strong’s occurrence with the corresponding translation as well as the way the word looked in its original form. The reason for this will become quite clear as we move forward. Keep in mind that this list does not contain all the other words translated for example as iniquity, guilty, wickedness and transgressed, but do not appear as sin in the text. This list contains only those Strong’s words which appear as sin in the English, but as we will see, also appear as various other concepts due to the inconsistency of the translators.

Strong's #

Seen as:

Obry Phonetic

Total Occurances

1st Occurance

1

H817

sin, guiltiness, trespass, offering, for his trespass, an offering of sin, at sin, with sin

AshM

46

Genesis 26:10

2

H819

sin(s), trespass, offering, trespass(ed)(ing), cause of trespass, their/our trespass, we have offered against

AshME

19

Leviticus 4:3

3

H2398

sin(ed)(ing)(ful), offended, loss, blame, fault, cleanse(ing), purify(ed) shall purify himself, he purify not himself, miss, trespass, reconciliation, they purify themselves, but he that sinneth against, he hath done

HTA

238

Genesis 20:6

4

H2399

sin, faults, offenses

HTA

33

Genesis 41:9

5

H2401

sin, sin offering

HTAE

8

Genesis 20:9

6

H2402

sin

HTAE

1

Isaiah 5:18

7

H2403

sin, sin offering, punishment

HTAE

294

Genesis 4:7

8

H2408

sin?

n/a

1?

Daniel 4:27

9

H2409

and for a sin offering

LHTYA

1

Ezra 6:17

10

H5512

sin

SYN

6

Exodus 16:1

11

H5771

sin, iniquity, remembrance, punishment(s) fault, mischief, iniquity to remembrance

OYN

230

Genesis 4:13

12

Alongside H5934

[of the sin] of his youth

not in the original text

n/a

Job 20:11

13

H6588

sin, transgression(s), rebellion, trespass

PshO

93

Genesis 31:36

14

H7686

sin through ignorance, ye have erred, to wander, and have erred, I have erred, and the deceiver, that causeth to err, wander(ed), which do err, and be thou ravished, he shall go astray, is deceived, they err

shGE

21

Leviticus 4:13


There are many aspects of the illustration above which should cause the reader to seriously consider just how nonchalantly, or rather inconsistently, your bibles have been translated. I do not know the words to describe how serious a problem we have, nor can I fathom the utter lack of understanding from my people. Would a writer be able to swap out words like, sin, cleanse, miss, and purify and have a consistent and accurate understanding of context? Not only are there the same words translated at completely different concepts in the text presented to the unwitting and naïve reader, but there are also several entirely different words translated as the same concept. Can this data be ignored simply because we are taught to take the testimony of any so-called believer as the gospel truth? Perhaps one believes they have heard from the Lord? The truth is that men lie, and one should never simply take someone’s word for something. One must test the motive of a so-called pastor. If indeed the Father has spoken to someone, that person will be aligned with the word, not the established mainstream narrative. Yeue's people will be peculiar. The point being is that words are cheap. Test someone by their actions and deeds. Judge them based on their works.

So, let us take a closer look at the data table to see if any of these words can give us an absolute definition of the concept sin. Firstly, H817 and H819 are the exact same word, except for H819 (AshM) simply has an E suffix. An example of a suffix slightly changing the meaning of a word, but not to the point of it being a totally different concept would be German and Germany. Perhaps Strong’s should have listed all root words with their cognates listed under each to avoid so much confusion-unless of course confusion was the intent from the very beginning. The single word sin is quite different than saying a trespass offering. The first time that H817 is translated as sin is in Proverbs 14:9 “Fools make a mock at sin: but among the righteous there is favour.” But in the words very first occurrence, it is translated at guiltiness in Genesis 26:10,And Abimelech said, what is this thou hast done unto us? one of the people might lightly have lien with thy wife, and thou shouldest have brought guiltiness upon us.” Can someone bring sin onto someone else? Or is the correct translation of H817 guiltiness? For the two are not synonymous. And one must also consider the E suffix and what affect this has on the meaning, for it is certainly not simple a grammatical difference only.


Next, we see H2398 and H2399. Again, they are the exact same word These words are also absolutely and completely different from the first two words in the table. How can two different words all be translated as a single concept-sin? The answer is simple. They cannot. The two words cat and mat are completely different concepts-a single letter rendering the distinction unquestionably so. H2389 is also translated as both loss and cleanse in Genesis 31:39 and Exodus 29:36. When one reads these two passages, the subject is completely different from the other as well as the word HTA itself. Do you see the problem? These are just a few examples of the overarching issue-that the translations we currently have access to are not correct. They cannot be faithfully trusted because they were not faithfully relayed to us.


The next set of words are Strong’s H2401, H2402, and H2403. Strong’s decided that this same word needed at least three different numbers assigned to them. Wouldn’t it have been much more clear and helpful for the reader, if those who so diligently created our concordances, numbered each word with all cognates listed below -with suffixes or prefixes? Perhaps these extremely educated me didn’t think about that. That is one explanation. The other of course requires a less trusting heart towards fallible and evil men perfected in the art of sophistry. In Leviticus, we can see a huge problem: Leviticus 4:35 And he shall take away all the fat thereof, as the fat of the lamb is taken away from the sacrifice of the peace offerings; and the priest shall burn them upon the altar, according to the offerings made by fire unto Yeue: and the priest shall make an atonement for his sin that he hath committed, and it shall be forgiven him. The word translated as sin is H2403 and the word translated as committed is H2398. Two entirely different words translated as the same word sin in both Genesis 20:6 and 20:9. One will find if they do a word study on a whole list of words, that they will find similar results. This is not an exception but a masoretic rule-this willy-nilly swapping out of words to hide the true meaning!


The implications are not going to be easy to digest. I will say this however, that we should not lose our faith in the Father, for because we rebelled against Him and his law, He has sent a famine of the word, Omus 8:11. The Word has been taken from us by the Father because we did not listen to Him. And even though the translations have been severely altered, the Father has not abandoned us. For those of us who are genetic Yshral, the apple of Hs eye, these words which were given to our people are written on our hearts. Contrary to popular belief, the law was never to be preserved upon parchment or papyrus from the cesspits of Egypt, but on the hearts of his specific and peculiar people. Deuteronomy 10:15 Yet Yeue has set His affection on your fathers and loved them. And He has chosen you, their descendants after them, above all the peoples, even to this day. Yes, the Father has chosen us over all other people. That is why the world hates us. Look at the media and see who is vilified, Germanics, Irish, Nordic people. They are Yshral. They are the descendants who were spoken to by the Father in the law and prophets. They are stories of our people. The Father’s word was never preserved by Jews and Jews are not Yshral. For if they were perfectly preserving the texts, why are there so many imperfections. MacDowell and others like him are intellectually dishonest and deceiving hundreds of millions of people all over the earth.


Leviticus 19:22 And the priest shall make an atonement for him with the ram of the trespass offering before Yeue for his sin which he hath done: and the sin which he hath done shall be forgiven him. This is a prime example of the absolute dishonestly of the translators’ work. Christians faithfully trust that their bibles mean what they say in English or German or whichever language they are encompassed in. There are five places where a particular word in the chart appears in the same exact sentence above. Trespass offering is H817. The two times sin appears in the passage it is H2403. And the phrases he hath done is H2398. What utter confusion! Of course, we cannot say that H817 is always translated as trespass offering because in Genesis 26:10 it appears as sin! The same goes for all of these Strong’s occurrences, as they appear as in at least one time in the text when in other places, they do not! These problems are not entirely difficult to discover so the question remains, why has a scholar such as Josh MacDowell not elaborated on them, dear reader?


H2408 claims to appear only in Daniel 4:27, however some of the Hebrew texts I looked at in both Esword and Qbible did not seem to match up and so this occurrence remains inconclusive and requires further study. The next occurrence H2409 only has one occurrence in Ezra 6:17. It is, however, quite similar to that of H2401, H2402, and H2403 with the prefix L.


This next occurrence is one that most are familiar with, and which they perhaps believe that each time one encounters the term sin in the text, that this is the word sin is translated from. It is H5512 and only appears in the OT on six occasions-the first being Exodus 16:1. The glyphs are almost identical to the modern English word and are pronounced the same, SYN. From each of the occurrences of the word, there does not appear a concrete definition, especially considering there are so many other words translated as sin, to contend with. And that is the point of going through the chart in detail. Not one of the occurrences provides a distinct definition, which is what we are looking for to see just what Josh MacDowell repented of all those years ago. What is most remarkable about this word is the very first time we see the word in the text, it comes up as being a geographical location, rather than an action against Yeue. Exodus 16:1 And they took their journey from Elim, and all the congregation of the children of Yshral came unto the wilderness of Sin, which is between Elim and Sinai, on the fifteenth day of the second month after their departing out of the land of Mitzriam.


In each of the occurrences of H5512, it is describing a place the nation of Mitzriam owns or controls. I included this word to show that compared to all the other occurrences of the word translated as sin in the OT, one cannot distinguish the word itself (when looking in English) from the others. When we look however, at the original glyphs, we see that these words are distinctly different and could not be mistaken. This fact alone should alert the reader that this could not have been by accident. The chart also shows quite plainly that the translations are not inerrant despite adamant claims to the contrary. The Word has not passed away and has indeed been preserved, but not by scribes and scholars.


The next occurrence is H5771 which occurs quite a few times throughout the text-an altogether different glyph set than all the others we have discussed thus far. The first time it appears is Genesis 4:13 And Qyn said unto Yeue, My punishment is greater than I can bear. Yeue certainly punished Qyn, however is the concept of punishment; something that takes places after an offense is committed, the same as the offense itself? The first time we see H5771 translated as sin is 1 Kings 17:18 And she said unto Elijah, what have I to do with thee, O thou man Alym? art thou come unto me to call my sin to remembrance, and to slay my son? This also happens to be the only time we see H5771 translated as sin. Most often it will be translated as iniquity and occasionally it will appear as a whole phrase as in the case of Leviticus 26:43, “of the punishment of their iniquity” from a single three-character word-OYN! Jeremiah 16:10 and Daniel 9:24 are worth particular note.

  • Jeremiah 16:10 And it shall come to pass, when thou shalt shew this people all these words, and they shall say unto thee, wherefore hath Yeue pronounced all this great evil against us? or what is our iniquity? or what is our sin that we have committed against Yeue Alym?

  • Daniel 9:24 Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy.

In the case of Jeremiah, we have H5771 translated as iniquity, H2403 translated as sin, and H2398 translated as committed. In the case of Daniel, we have H6588 translated as transgression, H2403 translated as sin, and 5771 translated as iniquity. Three different words in the same exact verse, which are all found in the text as sin elsewhere. One could simply make the claim that all these terms in English are interchangeable. Perhaps, but they are ignoring the fact that the Obry words are completely different words and are not. We gave absolutely no evidence to prove that the 14 words in Table 1, are synonyms or homonyms! Compare the following verses:

  • Leviticus 5:15 If a soul commit (H4603) a trespass (H4604), and sin(H2398) through ignorance, in the holy things of Yeue; then he shall bring for his trespass (H817) unto Yeue a ram without blemish out of the flocks, with thy estimation by shekels of silver, after the shekel of the sanctuary, for a trespass offering (H817):

  • Eze 33:12 Therefore, thou son of man, say unto the children of thy people, The righteousness of the righteous shall not deliver him in the day of his transgression(H6588): as for the wickedness of the wicked, he shall not fall thereby in the day that he turneth from his wickedness; neither shall the righteous be able to live for his righteousness in the day that he sinneth(H2398). 13 When I shall say to the righteous, that he shall surely live; if he trust his own righteousness, and commit(H6213) iniquity(H5766), all his righteousness shall not be remembered; but for his iniquity(H5766) that he hath committed(H6213), he shall die for it.

So here we have two entirely different Strong’s words translated as commit or committed, on top of H817, H2398, and H6588 being found translated as sin (also translated as transgression(s), rebellion, and trespass). The more one digs into this, the more convoluted the problem becomes. H6588 has 93 occurrences and appears to be translated somewhat consistently, however, it is, yet again, accompanied by other words in Table 1 also translated as sin! The following verse is a primary example of these terms being distinctly named and differentiated between one another: Exodus 34:7 Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear [the guilty]; visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, and upon the children's children, unto the third and to the fourth [generation]. The words in brackets were never in the original form and so we will therefore utterly exclude them from our study! The occurrence of iniquity in this passage is H5771, transgression being H6588, and sin being H2403. These are all completely different glyphs in the original form and therefore completely different concepts.


The last occurrence of the word sin found in the OT is yet different from all the rest. H7686 occurring 21 times is shGE. It is also identical to the H7685 which has four occurrences. We will look at each verse to compare with H7686. Leviticus 4:13 And if the whole congregation of Yshral sin through ignorance, and the thing he hid from the eyes of the assembly, and they have done [somewhat against] any of the commandments of Yeue concerning things which should not be done and are guilty; This occurrence is actually a phrase coming from just three characters-shGE. The word translated as guilty in the verse is actually H816, being identical to H817 and H818 but given a Strong’s listing as an entirely different word; a common practice as we have seen and for no other purpose than to deceive the reader. H7686 is translated in a various number of ways like, for example, in Job 6:24 Teach me, and I will hold my tongue: and cause me to understand wherein I have erred. So, it seems that Job sinned after all, or did he? Does this word H7686 mean to sin unknowingly? Perhaps. Perhaps not. This word also requires much study and to learn the true meaning of its cognates as well as the various prefixes and suffixes of Obry. If the reader however would simply say that the word shGE simply means to accidently sin, then please see 1 Samuel 26:21, as that verse also contains H2398 as we have already covered. Let us now take a look at the identical word H7685:

  • Job 8:7 Though thy beginning was small, yet thy latter end should greatly increase.

  • Job 8:11 Can the rush grow up without mire? can the flag grow without water?

  • Psalms 73:12 Behold, these are the ungodly, who prosper in the world; they increase in riches.

  • Psalms 92:12 The righteous shall flourish like the palm tree: he shall grow like a cedar in Lebanon.

Talk about utter deception! The translators knowingly and in full possession of all their faculties, translated 21 occurrences of the same word in roughly 12 different ways, and 4 occurrences of the identical characters (being H7685) as increase and grow! In all of this comparison, there has not been a verse in the form it exists in today (the masorah) which concretely defines the concept of sin. So, I wish to make abundantly clear, that in order for someone to repent, they must understand what sin is; does it even apply to their race? How they have sinned, and by repenting, they will cease that act and turn from it. In the past, I have understood sin to be breaking the law of the Father. Rebelling against His will. I still hold to that belief. And this short analysis of sin is by no means concluded. I simply wish to make absolutely clear, that josh MacDowell could not have repented of his sin, because first he does not understand its real meaning (or he certainly does not elaborate on it in his book) and claiming be spiritually changed and living a good life, is not definition as that is quite arbitrarily understood depending on recipient. And he does not teach or attempt to learn and keep the laws and statutes of the Father. In order to know what sin is, we must study the Father’s will and apart from the willy-nilly masorah, which has also been made abundantly clear.

Idolatry

If one truly repents of their sin, they do not then instantly partake in idolatry; for idolatry is described in the prophets as one of the most grievous of sins and the main reason of the exile of my ancestors, Yeuda (Deutsch) and Yshral. What is idolatry? Samuel was most indignant with the sin of his people, particularly Saul the first king, and he does a good job at summing up what idolatry is in 1 Samuel 15:23 For rebellion [is as] the sin of witchcraft, and stubbornness [is as] iniquity and idolatry. Because thou hast rejected the word of Yeue, he hath also rejected thee from [being] king. Even with all of the word changes and alterations, the clear message throughout the law and the prophets remains: not doing what the Father asks of us (His people) is described as many negative and evil things (not necessarily the same but all evil) which we do despite the many warnings not to. If we are simply going to go our own way and believe that we have got it all right, we will fail. We need the Father’s law to show us what is actually good and moral, for these concepts have been changed by man in many ways.


So, if rebellion is the sin of witchcraft, that word being H2403, seeming to be a specific kind of sin, then idolatry is stubbornness and iniquity together? I’d like to briefly mention that H205, translated at iniquity in the above verse, also being translated as various other concepts like evil in Proverbs 12:21 and unrighteousness in Isaiah 55:7. I did not include it in Table 1 however, because it is not translated as sin directly. There is much study to be done on the words in English and I am not neglecting the study of similar words associated sin, but for the sake of time I am attempting to show a basic understanding of idolatry in regard to Josh MacDowell worshipping someone other than the Father and praying to him. The word translated as idolatry in 1 Samuel 15:23 has its first occurrence in Genesis 31:19 And Laban went to shear his sheep: and Rachel had stolen the images that [were] her father's. Idolatry has to do with the reverence and worship of something or someone other than the Father. Is Christianity any different? No. The only difference is that they justify it in such a way as to deceive many to break the first commandment, without knowing that they are. This deception falls particularly hard upon the genetic descendants of Yshral, my people and who happen to be particularly prone to idolatry, aka Christianity. And I submit that is the very motive for creating Christianity in the first place. It wasn’t to bring the gospel to the congoid, that is for certain. But by all means, continue in your vain attempts in this endeavor, beloved stiff-necked Yshral!


MacDowell begins his repentance by breaking the very first commandment, have no other Al before the Father! I once believed that Jesus never claimed to be God in the flesh. I must now redact that belief, at least when it comes to the outlier that is John.


John 10:25-30 Jesus answered them, I told you, and ye believed not: the works that I do in my Father's name, they bear witness of me. But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you. My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me: And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand. My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand. I and my Father are one


John 8:58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am


These are very strong statements to make. Simply making the claim that he was indeed one with the Father, is not proof Jesus was and it contradicts the whole of the Law and the Prophets. Making a claim is NOT proof! I do not know to make that any clearer to the reader! The Father our Creator is the ONLY Aleym to be worshipped and there exists not a single verse in the OT that would corroborate this man John's claim. NOT one! Could one use the verse Genesis 1:26? NO! Because that word us, in the sentence is not actually in the original text. The word is H6213, and it is used 2633 times in the entire OT. It is translated as he made in Genesis 1:31. In Genesis 1:25 it simply appears as made. The translators were not consistent! And due to the fact that Genesis 1:26 is the only place we find us used, should raise some serious red flags regarding why the word us was even inserted in the first place.


Let us take a closer look at idolatry. So far as I could find, the word only appears in 1 Samuel 15:23 and it is not described as idol worship, but stubbornness. This concept, like sin, is convoluted and needs further investigation. There does seem to be an association between idolatry and whoredom. But is that due to dogma alone? Could idolatry be stubbornly idolizing after something or someone, like Trump, or Fox News, or Josh MacDowell? Yes, people idolize MacDowell and many others in this world. There are people who love him who haven’t even read his book! Stubbornly, they idolize him nonetheless! I see it every day. I could discuss how Trump has flip-flopped and people will still worship him regardless of the reality of his claims. I could show people speeches where Trump has encouraged people to get vaccinated, and they will still idolize him-while being adamantly against vaccination. Is Idolatry bowing down to a statue? Or is it idolizing men over the Father Himself-and yes, even Jesus? I ask the reader to at least consider this.


After MacDowell prays to Jesus, he claims that in 8 months his life had changed. He goes on to say that after becoming a Christian (subtly replacing the Father, breaking the first commandment, with Jesus Christ as all Christian are taught to do) he no longer wished to use others to his advantage, but to help others and serve people as best he can. Of course, he did so by becoming a lawyer, apologists, obtained various degrees and has made millions on the various 152 books he has helped to write-claiming to bring the gospel to the world. If that is the case, then why is the common Christian folk poorer than they have ever been and MacDowell quite wealth? His wiki pages and Amazon has honored him. He is of a higher status in the world than those who buy his books. Average Germanic, Nordic, Celtic people do not rise in the ranks of society unless they compromise and even then, they work for the word regime. How is Josh MacDowell helping people and serving them? It’s a genuine question to which I do not want wishy washy ambiguous answers. I really want to see the evidence of his claim that he truly wants to help people and which kinds of people. And yes, it matters.


MacDowell says that when he was younger, he had a very bad temper. This was obviously due to the fact that his younger homelife was full of rebellion and unrighteousness. A father who was a drunk and who beat his mother. A hired hand who abused him. A total rejection of the law and the prophets. Certainly, his bad temper would be quite understandable. But that temper in and of itself is not evil. It is not breaking any commandment. It is a natural response to evil and unrighteousness. This is something that I cannot stress enough-hatred and bigotry are NOT sin. They are not evil feelings. Having feelings of hatred, indignation, bigotry even, are not what someone may call sin. In fact, a deep study of the prophets will show that these righteous men were all of these things and more! The law requires indignation and hatred against evil and unrighteousness and bigotry-given these terms are defined correctly and in their proper context according to the Father. Hatred is essential in every Yshralite's life. In fact, the more I learn, the more indignant and hateful I become. It was like that for the prophets. The more the Father showed them the evil of Yshral, and more of His will, the more they became on fire for the righteousness of the Father and his perfect law! These are concepts virtually foreign in Christianity and the world at large.


If anyone should tell you that they have no hatred or indignant feelings about the way in which our world is organized and controlled, are either asleep or a direct part of the world regime. I have been a Christian my whole life and have interacted with many of them. Most Christians have tempers. Many do not. What does this prove exactly? Some have more control over their emotions than others and factors which cannot be quantified. We can speculate as to who are the true Christians and who are the fake Christians, but it is once again ambiguous. It does not prove anything. Someone could be angry because they just had a death in the family and their mood is no more proof of their beliefs than it proves what brand of coffee, they drink Sunday morning. And if someone claims to never get angry or lose their temper, they are lying! Even if they do not show their emotions in public and have a very good handle on them. Temper, whether under control or not, is not proof Jesus Christ ever lived.


Forgiving those who have hurt us deeply, comes with experience and the wisdom to understand that bitterness hurts us and continues to eat at us. It shows that we can move on with our lives and mentally cope with the various difficult circumstances in life. But is this concept found in the OT? Is forgiveness for everyone? Are we to forgive a congoid rapist and murderer who violated and slaughtered someone’s precious German toddler? No! Absolutely not! That, fill in the blank as to what you would call this particular type of savage aboriginal, deserves execution pure and simple. Not forgiveness, just as a rabid dog would be put down for biting his master, before hurting anyone else! It’s just one of those commonsense concepts we are indoctrinated to forget. I would like the reader to find a verse which makes unconditional forgiveness that abundantly clear, just as I would like them to also find polygamy to be a sin. They are simply not in the text. Note, that I am not saying every man should have a bunch of wives, I am simply making a point. Just as polygamy is not condemned by the Father, it is not required either. Is forgiveness a command? It is in the NT. But is it found in the OT?


What we do find regarding forgiveness in the OT, is the forgiveness of one’s own kin when they turn back to what is required of them by the Father. In other words, they turn back to the law and obey the Father. This word forgive, like many other concepts, also requires more study because the actual translation of the word forgive, is found only 27 times in the OT. But the Strong’s H5375 (translated as forgive only a few times) appears 653 times. That glyph set, or word forgive, is therefore not translated faithfully, just as sin is not translated faithfully. The first time H5375 is found as forgive, is in Genesis 50:17, when Joseph forgave the sin (there is that word again) of his brothers. We also see in other places where the Father forgives his people of their various grievances they committed against him, as well as future promises of forgiveness. But of the 27 occurrences of forgive, there is no command to forgive someone who has done something evil against that individual. It's just not there. We see various Yshralites asking the Father to forgive them. But we must read and study the context of these requests. Were they asking forgiveness because they broke the Father's law? And perhaps as equally important, did the Father forgive them? Without Jesus!?


Now, I am not saying that we should not forgive people. I am saying that I do not see where I am commanded to forgive every single evil act someone (of either Adamic or non-Adamic races) commits against me. In every single context that the word forgive is found, it is always speaking of Yshral. Perhaps forgiveness is based on the situation and the wisdom of that individual Adamic person. Perhaps it's based on the discretion of that individual. Again, this topic deserves more study.


The concept of forgiveness seems utterly foreign to non-Adamic people as well. I do not see the BLM forgiving those who never enslaves them. I do not see the red aboriginals of Amry (America) walking around town passing our forgiveness pamphlets. This concept of forgiveness seems to originate in Western European nations where a lot of my tribe resides. I have seen various news articles of a Congoid or Mongol being sentenced for murder, and the Aryan Christian family sitting there like pathetic week lambs forgiving a beast for slaughtering their loved one. Absolute insanity! Christians are taught to forgive anyone who offends them as a requirement to be saved (and we haven’t even got to that concept yet) and so they do it. I wonder though how many actually mean it? This is my current understanding, and the topic is by no means settled. I simply do not see this Christian concept of forgiveness in the OT. It certainly is not proof that Jesus Christ ever existed because a few White families were able to forgive a nigger for murdering their White child! It seems that people forgive because they are afraid of going to hell. Perhaps forgiveness in certain circumstances is even unwise if a person is asking for forgiveness to use that individual? Some things to think about and consider, as I will most certainly do as well.


MacDowell says that his life was changed in eighteen months and in another place, he claims that it was changed between about six to eighteen months. Trivial, I’m sure. He shares how his life was changed: how he treated people, that he forgave those who hurt him in the past, and he says that people can ridicule Christianity all they like but that it works. Well first, we must determine if this life-change described by MacDowell is a change for the Father or for Jesus and is that the same thing? And if Christianity truly does work, what exactly is it working to accomplish? Does it line up with the Father’s will? Or man’s will? These are some concepts that I will go into in future sections because they are simply not addressed thus far in MacDowell’s book.